1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00587702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-property relations in an injection-moulded, rubber-toughened, semicrystalline polyoxymethylene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanical properties and the morphologies of ternary blends of polycarbonate with a mechacrylated butadiene-styrene impact modifier and various brittle polymers were investigated by Paul et al They found, very interestingly, that for a better toughness the modifier should be located in the brittle polymer in ternary blend [12]. There are several factors, such as composition, processing conditions, adhesion between filler and elastomer, which may affect the dispersion and microstructure [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Most work is qualitative on toughening mechanism while the quantitative relationship between morphology and property has not been established yet so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanical properties and the morphologies of ternary blends of polycarbonate with a mechacrylated butadiene-styrene impact modifier and various brittle polymers were investigated by Paul et al They found, very interestingly, that for a better toughness the modifier should be located in the brittle polymer in ternary blend [12]. There are several factors, such as composition, processing conditions, adhesion between filler and elastomer, which may affect the dispersion and microstructure [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Most work is qualitative on toughening mechanism while the quantitative relationship between morphology and property has not been established yet so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding inorganic filler can enhance the stiffness but result in a decrease of toughness. To overcome the drawback resulted by only adding elastomer or filler, a lot of work has been done on polymer/elastomer/filler ternary system, where both elastomer and filler were used to enhance the toughness and stiffness simultaneously [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. To achieve the best combination of mechanical properties, the key is to control the dispersion and phase morphology of ternary composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of prior melting of the twin material was provided by small‐angle X‐ray and electron microscopy observations of the presence of lamellae after heating. Colson and coworkers13, 14 observed the behavior of individual fibers of POM upon heating, using an electron microscope, and they found that twin crystals melted at a lower temperature than crystals that were entirely of the main orientation. Mucha15, 16 reported the thermogravimetric decomposition of the POM homopolymer in the molten state in nitrogen and in an air atmosphere for comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition was at least 20 wt%. However, the tensile strength of POM decreases significantly when an elastomer is used for toughening . PEO is a better toughening agent for POM than thermoplastic elastomer and rubber.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%