2017
DOI: 10.1038/srep44470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-symptom relationship with wide-area ultrasound scanning of knee osteoarthritis

Abstract: The aetiology of knee pain in osteoarthritis (OA) is heterogeneous and its relationship with structural changes and function is unclear. Our goal was to determine the prevalence of wide-area scanned ultrasound-defined knee OA structural features and their association with pain and functional impairment in 79 symptomatic and 63 asymptomatic subjects. All subjects underwent ultrasound knee wide-area scanning and the severity of articular cartilage degeneration, the presence and size of osteophytes, and meniscal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
26
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, there was a relationship between meniscal extrusion and WOMAC indices, which was also reported in a study by Malas et al (20). However, in a study by Podlipska, there was no significant relationship with the cartilage grade after adjustments; therefore, this finding was only considered as a concomitant presentation (21). In the current study, after adjusting for the cartilage grade, there was a significant relationship with all WOMAC indices, indicating their independent role in the development of clinical symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, there was a relationship between meniscal extrusion and WOMAC indices, which was also reported in a study by Malas et al (20). However, in a study by Podlipska, there was no significant relationship with the cartilage grade after adjustments; therefore, this finding was only considered as a concomitant presentation (21). In the current study, after adjusting for the cartilage grade, there was a significant relationship with all WOMAC indices, indicating their independent role in the development of clinical symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This lack of relationship has been also noted in some of previous studies (20). However, in some other studies, examination of this relationship was considered unnecessary due to varying degrees of cartilage thickness in different individuals (21). However, this finding can be attributed to the type of patient selection (all of whom had OA with some degree of cartilage damage) and differences in measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to measuring cartilage size, an assessment of the cartilage ultrasound echo intensity ( i.e., brightness of the image) quantifies the integrity of the superficial cartilage collagen matrix ( Kuroki et al 2008 ). While cartilage breakdown appears on ultrasound as a loss of a sharp contour and alterations in the cartilage echo intensity ( Möller et al 2008 ), previous qualitative assessments indicate that it may lead to either a decrease or an increase of the ultrasound echo intensity ( Finucci et al 2015 ; Podlipská et al 2017 ). This highlights the need for assessments that directly quantify the magnitude and heterogeneity of the cartilage echo intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesized that thinner ultrasound-assessed cartilage would be associated with arthroscopic femoral cartilage damage because the presence of cartilage defects may be detected as cartilage thinning. Since there is qualitative evidence that a decline in cartilage health may result in lesser or greater cartilage echo intensity ( Möller et al 2008 ; Finucci et al 2015 ; Podlipská et al 2017 ), we hypothesized that altered quantitative ultrasound metrics of echo-intensity mean and heterogeneity would be associated with arthroscopic femoral cartilage damage. This study would provide preliminary evidence of which non-invasive quantitative cartilage ultrasound metrics may detect a decline in cartilage health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%