25th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1987
DOI: 10.2514/6.1987-530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structureborne noise control in advanced turboprop aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These vibrations are then perceived as additional noise inside the cabin, reducing passenger comfort. This phenomenon is known as structure-borne noise and has been extensively investigated in the 1980s, both experimentally [22][23][24][25][26] and analytically [27][28][29][30][31]. Its relevance was first outlined by the study of Miller et al [22], who identified the propeller blade-tip vortices as dominant sources of pressure fluctuations on the wing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These vibrations are then perceived as additional noise inside the cabin, reducing passenger comfort. This phenomenon is known as structure-borne noise and has been extensively investigated in the 1980s, both experimentally [22][23][24][25][26] and analytically [27][28][29][30][31]. Its relevance was first outlined by the study of Miller et al [22], who identified the propeller blade-tip vortices as dominant sources of pressure fluctuations on the wing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] The unsteady pylon loads cause vibrations, which are transmitted into the structure of the aircraft and can be perceived by the passengers as structure-borne noise. 11 This noise source can be mitigated by modifying the transmission path of the vibrations, 12 or by decreasing the amplitude of the unsteady aerodynamic loading. A possible way to reduce the amplitude of the unsteady loading is to use a pylon with a flowpermeable leading edge, also referred to as passive porosity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the lower or equal community noise levels compared with turbofans [12,14], a drawback of unducted propellers is increased cabin noise [16,17], in particular for flight Mach numbers ranging from 0.6 to 0.8. This noise is caused by an airborne contribution due to the unsteady pressure field induced by the rotating blades and the propeller-airframe interaction, and a structureborne contribution due to vibrations from the engines, propellers, and propeller-airframe interaction [18][19][20][21]. However, because of the significant propulsive efficiency benefit, as consistently demonstrated in several industrial and governmental research programs, propellers remain appealing for the next generation of energy-efficient aircraft.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Performance and Static Stability Characteristics...mentioning
confidence: 99%