1995
DOI: 10.1177/014920639502100406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structured Conflict and Consensus Outcomes in Group Decision Making

Abstract: Pressures for early consensus during group decision processes often lead to poor choices. However, consensus as an outcome of group decision processes is often desirable for implementing choices. We propose and test hypotheses that structured decision making techniques designed to enhance the expression of cognitive conflict will, paradoxically, (1) strengthen group consensus about and individual acceptance of the group S eventual choices, and (2) increase member satisfaction with the group. Faced with a reali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…age) was associated with emotional conflict but not with task-related conflict. Overall, task-related conflict is not necessarily undesirable since it may result in better decisions (Priem et al 1995).…”
Section: Cognitive Diversity In Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…age) was associated with emotional conflict but not with task-related conflict. Overall, task-related conflict is not necessarily undesirable since it may result in better decisions (Priem et al 1995).…”
Section: Cognitive Diversity In Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reaching a decision requires some sort of intelligence, which involves information gathering and processing, then designing which involves formulating and analyzing the decision alternatives, and final choice is made based on the judgments of best alternative to select. While the implementation facet includes the strategies essential to implement and create reached decision from the first facet (Harrison, et al,1995). Review of literature does not show the difference of decision speed between reaching a decision and implementation.…”
Section: Decision Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may reflect the importance of other factors, such as group conflict handling, in explaining how beneficial cognitive conflict will be on the group's outcomes. Priem, Harrison, and Muir (1995) found groups using the dialectical inquiry approach, a technique designed to enhance structured cognitive conflict, showed stronger member acceptance of decisions and satisfaction with the group, than did members of groups using the consensus approach. Jehn (1997) found groups with high levels of relationship conflict to have lower levels of performance and satisfaction than groups with low levels of relationship conflict.…”
Section: Literature Review Intragroup Conflictmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Group member satisfaction was measured using two items taken from Priem, Harrison, and Muir (1995). These items read "Working with this group has been an enjoyable experience" and "I would like to work with this group in the future.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%