2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structured deep embedding model to generate composite clinical indices from electronic health records for early detection of pancreatic cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Salvatore et al grouped relevant International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes into clinically relevant phenotypically related aggregates, “phecodes.” Using co-occurrence analysis, they identified that digestive and neoplasm phecodes were strong predictors of PC (44). Park et al utilized SHapley Additive exPlanations values to identify that kidney, liver function, diabetes, red blood cell, and white blood cell groups contributed the most in predicting PC risk from laboratory results (47). Jia et al (46) ranked features by univariate C-index to identify the independent contributors to PC risk prediction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Salvatore et al grouped relevant International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes into clinically relevant phenotypically related aggregates, “phecodes.” Using co-occurrence analysis, they identified that digestive and neoplasm phecodes were strong predictors of PC (44). Park et al utilized SHapley Additive exPlanations values to identify that kidney, liver function, diabetes, red blood cell, and white blood cell groups contributed the most in predicting PC risk from laboratory results (47). Jia et al (46) ranked features by univariate C-index to identify the independent contributors to PC risk prediction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed that 6 articles did not provide any information about the prediction time window or data exclusion time intervals (20,26,28,31,36,41). Only 12 studies experimented with 1 month-5 years of data exclusion time intervals (21,29,30,33,35,40,(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47). The C-index for the models without a curated set of predictors and 1 year lead time or exclusion time interval ranged from 0.71 to 0.83 for internal validations and 0.60-0.78 for external validations.…”
Section: Model Development and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A grouped neural network is proposed in 36 for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using laboratory health tracking. The work 37 describes a study that aims to develop new methods to simplify the large volume of patient medical records to improve clinical decision-making. The study uses deep-learning architectures to create simplified patient state representations that are predictive and interpretable to physicians.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%