Structured Public Involvement in Context-Sensitive Large Bridge Design Using Casewise Visual Evaluation

Abstract

Subject to engineering constraints, bridges should present a pleasing visual aspect to their user communities. The research team extended its structured public involvement (SPI) protocol using casewise visual evaluation (CAVE) to the field of context-sensitive large-scale bridge design. The context-sensitive design process was used for Section 2 of the Louisville Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges project. Key design parameters including bridge type, height, symmetry, complexity, and tunnel effect (superstructure shape) were identified by bridge designers. During a 3-month period, an SPI protocol was used to determine community preferences from Kentucky and Indiana participants. Group preferences were gathered rapidly, anonymously, and fairly from a focus group by using electronic polling technology to evaluate potential designs. A preference model was built by using CAVE, and a range of nonlinear preference variations relative to the design parameters was investigated. The favorable public evaluation results of the SPI process using CAVE are presented, and the reasons for its high performance are discussed. Emphasis is placed on the need for a close collaboration between bridge designers and public involvement specialists. The project demonstrates how an analytic approach to public involvement that integrates technology into the dialogic relationship between designers and the public allows for the achievement of inclusive, successful context-sensitive design even for large, complex infrastructure projects.

Toward a unified theory of project governance: economic, sociological and psychological supports for relational contracting

“…Qualitative studies of a Hong Kong railway extension (Bayliss et al, 2004) as well as comparative case studies undertaken by the governments of Hong Kong (Chan et al, 2004) and the United Kingdom (Latham, 1994) provide richer supporting evidence in support of this argument as do case studies of Terminal 5 at Heathrow Airport in London (Gil, 2009), Sutter Health's process of hospital construction (Khanzode et al, 2008), the Taralga wind farm in New South Wales Australia (Gross, 2007), the Ohio River Bridges Project (Bailey et al, 2007), the Capital Beltway extension (Groat, 2004(Groat, , 2006 and Chevron's onshore liquid natural gas processing facility in Angola (Angola LNG, 2006). 5…”

Use of Structured Public Involvement to Identify Community Preferences for a Superfund Site End State Vision

“…As well, it is problematic to even specify the nature of those conditions or outcomes at the outset in terms that reflect the fundamental considerations of the individuals involved. Further, even in cases where the preference mechanism is straightforward, as in aesthetic preferences, it is impractical to expect consistent feedback from participants for more than about an hour (Bailey et. al.…”

Use of Context-Sensitive Methods to Influence Operating Speeds

“…The Casewise Visual Evaluation (CAVE) method introduced by Bailey et al (18) applied fuzzy set-based cellular automata algorithms to group-based visual analysis. CAVE has been used to evaluate public satisfaction with rural highway designs (19), context-sensitive noise walls (20), and urban transit-oriented development (21). However, this is its first application to perceptions of operating speed.…”