2006
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structured treatment interruptions (STI) in chronic unsuppressed HIV infection in adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential benefits of structured interruptions should be weighed against the risks, which include the development of HIV-related illnesses and viral resistance. A recent meta-analysis confirmed all these findings, showing evidence of harm in patients with relatively advanced HIV disease, and concluding that structured treatment interruptions were not presently recommended [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The potential benefits of structured interruptions should be weighed against the risks, which include the development of HIV-related illnesses and viral resistance. A recent meta-analysis confirmed all these findings, showing evidence of harm in patients with relatively advanced HIV disease, and concluding that structured treatment interruptions were not presently recommended [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Studies have shown that structured interruptions of treatment significantly increased the risk of opportunistic disease or death from any cause for persons infected with HIV [8,9], but there are few studies focusing on pregnant women. The clinical implications of treatment discontinuation after delivery have not been established in the era of potent ARVs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has been opined that the viral rebound during structured cART interruption is not harmful, this has been contradicted by the SMART study which demonstrated an increased incidence of opportunistic infection and death in persons who underwent structured treatment interruption compared to those who did not, while not decreasing the adverse effects of antiretroviral therapy (68,81,82); however, these and similar studies focused primarily on viral rebound and subsequent viral suppression after cART reinitiation (83). Within this cohort, numerous treatment interruptions, although due to patient adherence and not medically controlled, were recorded and may have contributed to the wide range of subsequent pathologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in other population groups that investigated interruptions as therapeutic alternatives to continuous therapy such as intentional treatment holidays and unintentional interruptions have found harmful results. Initial concerns about long-term safety and reports of a lack of improved virological response in trials of structured interruptions [32,33] were confirmed by the Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) study, which found that CD4-guided episodic therapy increases the risk of opportunistic disease or death in relation to continuous treatment [34]. A review of unstructured TIs found an increased risk of opportunistic infections, virological failure, drug resistance, poor immunological recovery and death [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%