The
structural chemistry of intermetallic phases is generally viewed in
terms of what crystal structure will be most stable for a given combination
of metallic atoms. Yet, individual atoms do not always make the best
reference points. As the number of elements involved in compounds
increases, their structures can often appear to be assembled from
structural motifs derived from simpler compounds nearby in the phase
diagram rather than fundamentally new arrangements of atoms. In this
Article, we explore the notion that complex multinary phases can be
viewed productively in terms of motif-preserving reactions between
binary compounds, as opposed to direct reactions of the component
elements. We present the targeted synthesis and structure solution
of Ca3Cu7.8Al26.2, an intermetallic
phase whose placement in the phase diagram is suggestive of a reaction
between CaAl4 and CuAl2. Single-crystal X-ray
diffraction analysis reveals that this compound crystallizes in the
Y3TaNi6+x
Al26 (or
stuffed BaHg11) structure type and is constructed from
three modules: Ca@(Cu/Al)16 polyhedra derived from the
BaAl4 type, Cu@Al8 cubes, and Al13 cuboctahedra. To help understand this arrangement, we identify forces
driving the reactivity of one of the supposed starting materials,
CaAl4, through visualization of its atomic charge distribution
and chemical pressure (CP) scheme, which suggest that the Al sites
closest to the Ca atoms should show a high affinity for substitution
by Cu atoms. Such a process on its own, however, would lead to overly
long Ca–Cu distances and electron deficiency. When Cu is made
available to CaAl4 in the Ca–Cu–Al ternary
system, its incorporation in the Ca coordination environments instead
nucleates domains of a fluorite-like CuAl2 phase, which
act as nodes in the primitive cubic framework of CaAl4-
and fluorite-like units. The cubic holes created by this framework
are occupied by Al13 face-centered-cubic fragments that
donate electrons while also resolving negative CPs in the Ca environments.
This structural chemistry illustrates how new elements added to a
binary compound at sites with conflicting electronic and atomic size
preferences can serve as anchor points for the growth of domains of
different bonding types, a notion that can be applied as a more general
design strategy for new intermetallic intergrowth structures.