2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.theochem.2005.12.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures and stabilities of sugar radical nucleotides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially the free energy of the radical at the C 1 position is dramatically lower than that of the radical at the C 2 position. Our calculation results are reasonably consistent with the relative stability of the different sugar radicals that have been calculated by several other groups, and the order is generally found to be C 1 > C 4 > C 5 > C 3 > C 2 . The lower energy levels of the sugar radicals at C 1 and C 4 positions drive the radicals at the C 2 and C 3 positions to further isomerize to the C 1 and C 4 positions respectively through a hydrogen shift.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Especially the free energy of the radical at the C 1 position is dramatically lower than that of the radical at the C 2 position. Our calculation results are reasonably consistent with the relative stability of the different sugar radicals that have been calculated by several other groups, and the order is generally found to be C 1 > C 4 > C 5 > C 3 > C 2 . The lower energy levels of the sugar radicals at C 1 and C 4 positions drive the radicals at the C 2 and C 3 positions to further isomerize to the C 1 and C 4 positions respectively through a hydrogen shift.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The difference between the Gibbs free energies of the C1 0 -and C2 0 -centered radicals is found to be 8.0, 6.4, and 6.6 kcal/mol at the B3LYP/ AUG-cc-pVDZ, BHandHLYP/AUG-cc-pVDZ, and MP2/AUG-cc-pVDZ levels of theory in gas phase, respectively (Table III). Several previous gas phase theoretical studies [11,15,[18][19][20] have shown that the deoxyribose radicals centered at the C1 0 and C2 0 sites are most and least stable, while other gas phase theoretical studies [16,17] have shown that C4 0 -and C2 0 -centered deoxyribose radicals are most and least stable, respectively (Table III). As the molecules from which the radicals are derived and the levels of theory used are not the same [11,[15][16][17][18][19][20], a quantitative comparison of the results obtained in these studies cannot be made (Table III).…”
Section: Table IIImentioning
confidence: 94%