2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-018-01918-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures as relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That assumption grounds the “either/or” intuition—that appearances' matter must either be numerically identical with the thing in itself tout court , or else must be something different, related to the thing in itself only through some (external) causal connection. Some deployments of the notions of form and matter in the broad Aristotelian tradition might be taken to have something of this “thing‐like” flavor—for example, when mediaeval Aristotelians postulated individual substantial forms with causal powers, or when Michele Paolini Paoletti (2021) takes inspiration from Aristotelian forms to posit really existing structures exercising “top‐down” causal powers to constitute complex entities. But this forms‐as‐objects picture is neither the only possible hylomorphism, nor a plausible way of understanding Kant's formal idealism.…”
Section: Formal Idealismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That assumption grounds the “either/or” intuition—that appearances' matter must either be numerically identical with the thing in itself tout court , or else must be something different, related to the thing in itself only through some (external) causal connection. Some deployments of the notions of form and matter in the broad Aristotelian tradition might be taken to have something of this “thing‐like” flavor—for example, when mediaeval Aristotelians postulated individual substantial forms with causal powers, or when Michele Paolini Paoletti (2021) takes inspiration from Aristotelian forms to posit really existing structures exercising “top‐down” causal powers to constitute complex entities. But this forms‐as‐objects picture is neither the only possible hylomorphism, nor a plausible way of understanding Kant's formal idealism.…”
Section: Formal Idealismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We distinguish between Object-Centered States, which are associated with a single Object, and Ensemble States, which describe the interaction of several independent Objects. 9 Paoletti (2018) proposes that the Structure of an Object consists of all the internal relationships of that Object. Further, he proposes that Structure should be considered as an entity in its own right.…”
Section: States Transitions and Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison, applied science attempts to use those frameworks to predict or explain real-world phenomena. Given science's success, it is reasonable to identify objects as entities with "causal powers" (Paoletti, 2018) and that what is real is what is consistent with scientific results.…”
Section: Causationmentioning
confidence: 99%