1989
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7952(89)90031-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures associated with strike-slip faults that bound landslide elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
137
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These surface features act as conduits for the infiltration of water, and this strongly points out to the importance of mapping their distribution and evolution at the surface of an active landslide. Furthermore, it has also been observed how the overall pattern in rate and distribution of movement at the surface of an active and slowmoving landslide can be locally influenced by the presence of major structural elements at the landslide surface (Fleming et al, 1988;Fleming and Johnson, 1989;Baum et al, 1996). Lack of data on the location and characters of these major structural elements, and their influence on variability of the landslide movement, may lead to incorrect interpretations of the spatial and/or seasonal variations in the landslide movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These surface features act as conduits for the infiltration of water, and this strongly points out to the importance of mapping their distribution and evolution at the surface of an active landslide. Furthermore, it has also been observed how the overall pattern in rate and distribution of movement at the surface of an active and slowmoving landslide can be locally influenced by the presence of major structural elements at the landslide surface (Fleming et al, 1988;Fleming and Johnson, 1989;Baum et al, 1996). Lack of data on the location and characters of these major structural elements, and their influence on variability of the landslide movement, may lead to incorrect interpretations of the spatial and/or seasonal variations in the landslide movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keefer and Johnson (1983) distinguished three different ways ridges can form at the flanks of an earthflow; Zaruba and Mencl (1982) and Fleming et al (1988) used the height of the flank ridges to estimate the displacement of landslides. Fleming and Johnson (1989) distinguished ridges formed by deposition from those formed by deformation of landslide debris; they also surveyed the growth of flank ridges and the development of structures associated with them. Corominas (1995) has more recently reviewed many of the proposed mechanisms for formation of flank ridges; he made a strong case for basal erosion and shear in the development of flank ridges.…”
Section: The Flank Ridges At the Narrowest Part Of The Landslidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field observations suggest that, under certain conditions, deformation involved in slip surfaces underlying slow-moving landslides may be similar to those associated with tectonic faults [Fleming and Johnson, 1989;Gomberg et al, 1995], albeit at different scales as well as temperature and pressure conditions. Some studies [e.g., Fukao, 1995] argue that landslides are often described as dislocations due to gravitational potential energy represented by a single force in contrast to tectonic earthquakes described as dislocations due to the release of strain energy represented as double-couple forces.…”
Section: Geophysical Research Letters Research Lettermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, numerous studies have treated slow-moving landslides as shear dislocations, the equivalent force system of which is the double couple. For example, Fleming and Johnson [1989] consider the landslide as a fracture in their conceptual model, and Muller and Martel [2000] discuss the mechanics of the ED model applied to landslides.…”
Section: Geophysical Research Letters Research Lettermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means that the slope, which is formed by high activity soil, can be prone to creep [5]. On the other hand, landslide, including soil creep, also can be influenced by geological structures [6,7]. Their orientation can affect the slope stability if it has the same or inline orientation with the orientation of the slope [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%