2006
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m605886200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures of R- and T-stateEscherichia coliAspartokinase III

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The representatives from the first four classes of the AAKF transfer the ␥-phosphate of ATP to a carboxylate or carbamate group of the substrates making acylphosphate bonds, whereas the UMPK enzymes phosphorylate a phosphate group of uridilate. The crystal structure of FomA protein confirmed the assignment of FomA to the AAKF because the enzyme exhibits the polypeptide fold found in all members of the AAKF for which crystal structures have been determined: N-acetyl-L-glutamate kinases (32-34), glutamate-5-kinase (35), carbamate kinase (36), aspartokinases (37)(38)(39), and uridylate kinases (40 -43). The search was made by the secondary structure matching data base (44) using FomA coordinates from the FomA⅐MgAMPPNP⅐fosfomycin complex, because that structure is more ordered and complete in comparison to the FomA⅐ DPO one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The representatives from the first four classes of the AAKF transfer the ␥-phosphate of ATP to a carboxylate or carbamate group of the substrates making acylphosphate bonds, whereas the UMPK enzymes phosphorylate a phosphate group of uridilate. The crystal structure of FomA protein confirmed the assignment of FomA to the AAKF because the enzyme exhibits the polypeptide fold found in all members of the AAKF for which crystal structures have been determined: N-acetyl-L-glutamate kinases (32-34), glutamate-5-kinase (35), carbamate kinase (36), aspartokinases (37)(38)(39), and uridylate kinases (40 -43). The search was made by the secondary structure matching data base (44) using FomA coordinates from the FomA⅐MgAMPPNP⅐fosfomycin complex, because that structure is more ordered and complete in comparison to the FomA⅐ DPO one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This confusion originated because of the overall sequence similarity within the AK enzyme family. Lysine-sensitive E. coli AKIII and Arabidopsis AK share about 30% sequence identity with each other (8,9) and have about the same level of sequence identity with the threonine-sensitive mjAK. However, these enzyme families can be distinguished through a comparison of their respective regulatory domain sequences, with the lysine-sensitive AKs having greater than 35% identity with each other and less than 25% identity with the threonine-sensitive mjAK.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these regulatory domains is composed of two signature ACT subdomains that are the identifying structural feature of this enzyme superfamily that includes aspartokinases (A), chorismate mutases (C), prephenate dehydrogenases (TyrA, T), and a number of other dehydrogenases, dehydratases, and oxygenases (22). Although there is also high overall structural similarity within the regulatory domains of the three different AKs, the critical latch loop that undergoes rotational rearrangements leading to tetramer formation and the transition from the R-to T-state in the lysine-sensitive AKs consists of a dozen mainly hydrophilic residues (8,9). In mjAK, the same loop is shortened to only four residues and does not appear to play any role in conformational rearrangements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the crystallographic structures AKs are categorized into three classes. Class I contains the homo-dimeric enzymes from E. coli , Methanococcus jannaschii and A. thaliana with one catalytic domain and two ACT domains per monomer [26], [27], [28]. The dimerization is mediated by the association of the ACT domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%