2015
DOI: 10.1075/la.223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures, Strategies and Beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that this is modeled via Agree, that Agree is sensitive to phase boundaries and that there is a phase boundary at the periphery of vP, a (non subject) associated XP is predicted not to be able to stay in situ. It would have to move at least as high as the periphery of the vP phase to become accessible to probing by the head of CliticP (see Angelopoulos 2019b for a similar approach to Clitic Doubling), in a way consistent with Chomsky (2015). This is true for French: in bare cliticization, the pro associate of the clitic must raise to CliticP via KP (as in tree ( 69)) and cannot reconstruct lower than KP.…”
Section: Clitic Phrasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that this is modeled via Agree, that Agree is sensitive to phase boundaries and that there is a phase boundary at the periphery of vP, a (non subject) associated XP is predicted not to be able to stay in situ. It would have to move at least as high as the periphery of the vP phase to become accessible to probing by the head of CliticP (see Angelopoulos 2019b for a similar approach to Clitic Doubling), in a way consistent with Chomsky (2015). This is true for French: in bare cliticization, the pro associate of the clitic must raise to CliticP via KP (as in tree ( 69)) and cannot reconstruct lower than KP.…”
Section: Clitic Phrasesmentioning
confidence: 99%