“…Whereas the RJ-based STARR program utilized language consistent with goals espoused in the contemporary student conduct literature (e.g., harm, repair, dialogue, trust, voluntary, agreement), the Model Code language was dominated by conventional justice and punitive sanctioning (e.g., witness, charges, hearing, suspension, expulsion). In a 2014 study comparing outcomes of more than 600 student conduct cases at 18 US educational institutions, RJ approaches were found to better meet student conduct goals than the quasi-criminal justice processes created through institutional adaptations of the Model Code (Karp and Sacks 2014). The study assessed six conduct process learning outcomes, and for each one, resolution model type (RJ, RJ combined with traditional resolution, or Model Code) was the most important predictor of success.…”