2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student Engagement in One-Shot Library Instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Academic librarians have given a great deal of focus on understanding how to either enhance effectiveness of the one-shot interaction or to address whether the assessment tools used are appropriate measures of the 7 authentic outcomes. Walker and Pearce (2014), for example, examined the effect of greater engagement in the classroom through user-centered instruction. They found that, regardless of the delivery method, the one-shot is ineffective in "serving the information needs of students (p.…”
Section: Information Literacy and Embedded Librarianshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academic librarians have given a great deal of focus on understanding how to either enhance effectiveness of the one-shot interaction or to address whether the assessment tools used are appropriate measures of the 7 authentic outcomes. Walker and Pearce (2014), for example, examined the effect of greater engagement in the classroom through user-centered instruction. They found that, regardless of the delivery method, the one-shot is ineffective in "serving the information needs of students (p.…”
Section: Information Literacy and Embedded Librarianshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results further reveal a faculty-librarian collaboration "sweet spot" at the intermediate level. Not surprisingly, the traditional "oneshot," where there is no syllabus and/or assignment collaboration and the librarian pops into class once to briefly explain information literacy concepts, does not effectively build students' IL skills (Walker & Pearce, 2014). At the same time, IL skills were not significantly better when librarians were in the classroom many times.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Some studies take a maximalist approach, suggesting revamping student learning outcomes at the curricular (or campus) level, integrating multiple (five or more) library instruction sessions into courses, meeting individually with students at each step of the research cycle, faculty-librarian team teaching, or adding a hands-on semester long research lab to existing courses (Atwong & Heichman Taylor, 2008;Cassidy & Hendrickson, 2013;Gilbert, Knutson, & Gilbert, 2012;Hearn, 2005;Lampert, 2005;Lindstrom & Shonrock, 2006;Mackey & Jacobson, 2005). Others suggest that requiring students to attend just one library session makes a noticeable difference to student learning (Kenney, 2008;Pierce, 2009;Rinto & Cogbill-Seiders, 2014;Walker & Pearce, 2014).…”
Section: Ambivalence #2: Faculty-librarian Collaboration Is the Solutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collected from student surveys are most often analyzed using descriptive statistics, such as percentages and averages, to identify differences between students' responses before and after receiving library instruction. As noted by Walker and Pearce (), however, descriptive statistics can provide some insight into student learning but cannot determine whether or not changes in student responses were statistically significant. A smaller number of studies (Bryan & Karshmer, ; Halpern, ) have used inferential statistics in a formal hypothesis testing framework, such as t ‐tests and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), to obtain more conclusive and generalizable results.…”
Section: Research Methods Used In Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 98%