2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.teln.2021.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student faculty committee: A quality improvement and engagement strategy in nursing education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the quantitative studies, two followed a cross-sectional design [ 24 , 25 ], and two were descriptive [ 26 , 27 ]. In relation to qualitative ones, one was a review of the literature with a focus group constitution [ 28 ], and the other underwent quality framework appraisal [ 29 ]. According to the mixed-method studies incorporated, two were reviews of the literature, including empirical research [ 30 , 31 ], and the last one had a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach [ 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the quantitative studies, two followed a cross-sectional design [ 24 , 25 ], and two were descriptive [ 26 , 27 ]. In relation to qualitative ones, one was a review of the literature with a focus group constitution [ 28 ], and the other underwent quality framework appraisal [ 29 ]. According to the mixed-method studies incorporated, two were reviews of the literature, including empirical research [ 30 , 31 ], and the last one had a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach [ 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the origin of these studies, almost half of them addressed nursing education in Europe (n = 4) [ 25 , 28 , 30 , 32 ]. The rest tackled nursing education in North America (n = 3) [ 27 , 29 , 31 ], South America [ 26 ], among East and Southeast Asia [ 24 ]. The majority of these studies reported the current situation of the nursing curricular degree and its evaluation [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations