2021
DOI: 10.20429/ijsotl.2021.150108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student-generated Questions: Developing Mathematical Competence through Online-Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies focused on the self-regulation of students. Methods for increasing self-regulation by assessing students formatively included question generating and giving students responsibility for their assessment (Caspari-Sadeghi et al, 2021), possible interaction of students with formative questions (Chen et al, 2018), as well as the influence of journaling, self-assessment, and peer-sharing on cognition regulation strategies of students (Hwang et al, 2015). Other key publications focused on the increase of students' engagement through formative assessment, including online assessment through formative quizzes (Holmes, 2018;Hughes et al, 2020), formative portfolio assessment (Nicholson, 2018), or peer assessment (Chen et al, 2021;Sullivan & Watson, 2015;Vaughan, 2014).…”
Section: Summary Of Results For Rq1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies focused on the self-regulation of students. Methods for increasing self-regulation by assessing students formatively included question generating and giving students responsibility for their assessment (Caspari-Sadeghi et al, 2021), possible interaction of students with formative questions (Chen et al, 2018), as well as the influence of journaling, self-assessment, and peer-sharing on cognition regulation strategies of students (Hwang et al, 2015). Other key publications focused on the increase of students' engagement through formative assessment, including online assessment through formative quizzes (Holmes, 2018;Hughes et al, 2020), formative portfolio assessment (Nicholson, 2018), or peer assessment (Chen et al, 2021;Sullivan & Watson, 2015;Vaughan, 2014).…”
Section: Summary Of Results For Rq1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies focused on the self-regulation of students. Methods for increasing self-regulation by assessing students formatively included question generating and giving students responsibility for their assessment (Caspari-Sadeghi et al, 2021), possible interaction of students with formative questions (Chen et al, 2018), as well as the influence of journaling, self-assessment, and peer-sharing on cognition regulation strategies of students (Hwang et al, 2015). Other key publications focused on the increase of students' engagement through formative assessment, including online assessment through formative quizzes (Holmes, 2018;Hughes et al, 2020), formative portfolio assessment (Nicholson, 2018), or peer assessment Sullivan & Watson, 2015;Vaughan, 2014).…”
Section: Summary Of Results For Rq1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benzer, Sefer, Oren, and Konuk (2016) believe that having students write summaries helps them determine the main point of the text and recall material. The Student-Generated Questions technique promotes self-regulated learning by shifting the evaluation from the teacher to the students (Caspari-Sadeghi, Forster-Heinlein, Maegdefrau, & Bachl, 2021). This activity encourages students to engage in deeper and more active learning, and provides a framework for their ideas and comprehension of scientific concepts (Chin & Brown, 2002).…”
Section: Types Of Classroom Assessment Techniques (Cats)mentioning
confidence: 99%