2020
DOI: 10.26681/jote.2020.040311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student Involvement in Flipped Classroom Course Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies that included procedural knowledge components addressed theories, frames of reference [26,27], adaptive equipment [28], psychosocial dysfunction [29], communication partner training for adult aphasia [30], and interprofessional team skills [31]. Studies involving both procedural knowledge and professional reasoning addressed ergonomics, autonomy, activity analysis, and other OT subjects [32], adult practice [33], mental health [34], fieldwork training [35], interprofessional team skills in childhood, school practice [36], dolive-well framework [37], and problem-based learning (OTA:) scenarios [38]. In addition, the studies included only professional reasoning elements and provided casebased professional reasoning training, such as sensory processing and occupational performance process model (OPPM) application of cases [39][40][41] (Table 1).…”
Section: Key Clinical Skills Subjects and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that included procedural knowledge components addressed theories, frames of reference [26,27], adaptive equipment [28], psychosocial dysfunction [29], communication partner training for adult aphasia [30], and interprofessional team skills [31]. Studies involving both procedural knowledge and professional reasoning addressed ergonomics, autonomy, activity analysis, and other OT subjects [32], adult practice [33], mental health [34], fieldwork training [35], interprofessional team skills in childhood, school practice [36], dolive-well framework [37], and problem-based learning (OTA:) scenarios [38]. In addition, the studies included only professional reasoning elements and provided casebased professional reasoning training, such as sensory processing and occupational performance process model (OPPM) application of cases [39][40][41] (Table 1).…”
Section: Key Clinical Skills Subjects and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that included procedural knowledge components addressed theories, frames of reference (FOR) [25,26], adaptive equipment [27], psychosocial dysfunction [28], communication partner training for adult aphasia [29], and interprofessional team skills [30]. Studies involving both procedural knowledge and clinical reasoning addressed ergonomics, autonomy, activity analysis, and other OT subjects [31], adult practice [32], mental health [33], eldwork training [34], interprofessional team skills in childhood, school practice [35], do-live-well (DLW) framework [36], and problem-based learning (PBL) scenarios [37]. In addition, the studies included only clinical reasoning elements and provided case-based clinical reasoning training, such as sensory processing and occupational performance process model (OPPM) application of cases [38][39][40] (Table 1).…”
Section: Key Clinical Skill Subjects and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ipped classroom design was used in two studies. Henderson et al [32] compared the ipped course group with the subject of adult practice and the group involved in the ipped course design; both groups showed equal effects on learning outcomes and clinical reasoning skills. Students participating in the study by Lewis-Kipkulei et al [43] mentioned that ipped learning has a positive impact on peer interaction and collaboration, and the bene ts of having more personalized time for learning (Table 1).…”
Section: Digital Learning Design and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Autoethnography presents opportunities to create spaces for students and faculty to co-construct knowledge by weaving in critiques of power structures that intersect at the personal, political, historical, and cultural levels (Bell et al, 2020;Cervantes-Soon, 2014, p.;Silva, 2017). Furthermore, considering students' expertise and integrating their input in the development of social work curricula can enhance student participation and build a culture of collaboration between students and faculty (Fuentes et al, 2021;Henderson et al, 2020;. Revising social work curriculum and engagement activities in partnership with students considering these multilayered challenges, can promote a counter culture that disrupts the reproduction of neoliberal transactional relationships of commodity and hierarchy.…”
Section: Fighting a Culture Of Burnout By Building A Culture Of Relationality And Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%