2017
DOI: 10.1186/s40594-017-0095-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student learning outcomes from a pilot medical innovations course with nursing, engineering, and biology undergraduate students

Abstract: Background: Preparing today's undergraduate students from science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) and related health professions to solve wide-sweeping healthcare challenges is critical. Moreover, it is imperative that educators help students develop the capabilities needed to meet those challenges, including problem solving, collaboration, and an ability to work with rapidly evolving technologies. We piloted a multidisciplinary education (ME) course aimed at filling this gap, and subsequently assess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond asserting the benefits of prototyping itself, however, the literature lacks a comprehensive exploration of the impact of makerspace projects on student learning outcomes and student experiences, especially specific to engineering. In one study on an interdisciplinary undergraduate STEM course where students used a makerspace, students reported gains in collaborative skills and creativity, as well as an appreciation of experiential learning (Ludwig et al 2017). In engineering, research suggests that makerspace usage can increase confidence, creativity, and entrepreneurial thinking in students (Longo et al 2017).…”
Section: Gaps In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond asserting the benefits of prototyping itself, however, the literature lacks a comprehensive exploration of the impact of makerspace projects on student learning outcomes and student experiences, especially specific to engineering. In one study on an interdisciplinary undergraduate STEM course where students used a makerspace, students reported gains in collaborative skills and creativity, as well as an appreciation of experiential learning (Ludwig et al 2017). In engineering, research suggests that makerspace usage can increase confidence, creativity, and entrepreneurial thinking in students (Longo et al 2017).…”
Section: Gaps In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…JMU X-Labs comprises two primary spaces. The first is an academic makerspace, which serves as an educational laboratory equipped with teleconferencing capabilities, fabrication equipment, such as laser cutters and 3D printers, and digital technologies dedicated to instruction [25], including the computing hardware and software to support rendering of 3D modeling and augmented and virtual reality applications. The second is a classroom with fixed seating, which is also equipped with teleconferencing capabilities.…”
Section: Innovation Education In Practice: a Sketch Of Jmu X-labsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the subject was taught at master-degree level, it can be implemented in undergraduate level. Previous pilots have suggested the high feasibility of enabling undergraduate students with different academic background to address biomedical problems together [6,14]. Engineering students require medical knowledge to enable them to use technology to solve health problems.…”
Section: Implementation In Other Levels Of Coursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…electronic and mechanical engineering) subjects, their student intake numbers are usually much smaller than traditional engineering courses. Some universities are trying to offer subjects which provide multi-disciplinary education allowing future engineers to sit together with future clinicians to learn the ways to solve health-related topics [6]. Engineers need to have good understanding of the human body and different sorts of diseases, before they can apply good engineering solutions to solve the medical problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%