Student life - Try this for an experience

McDonald, Grace

doi:10.7748/ns2013.08.27.49.64.s59

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We expected no relationship between precariousness and age, which was supported, except that there were weak relationships for the total score (r ¼ .15, p < .05) and the Job Insecurity subscale (r ¼ .19, p < .01), suggesting that older students reported more job insecurity precariousness. This might reflect that older students felt more precariousness as they were losing, or had lost, their "junior" employee status and were at greater risk as they needed to be paid at the adult employee rate (McDonald et al, 2013). Precariousness was also unrelated to the number of hours worked, apart from a moderate relationship with the Remuneration subscale (r ¼ À.29***, p < .001), suggesting that the income of those working fewer hours does not meet their financial needs, which might be expected.…”

Section: Phase 4: Construct Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Development and Initial Validation of a Self-Report Job Precariousness Scale Suitable for Use With Young Adults Who Study and Work

Creed

Hood

Selenko

et al. 2020

Journal of Career Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Precarious employment has been increasing worldwide. Yet there are few scales suitable to assess it, and no scales to measure perceived job precariousness in working students who are particularly vulnerable. Using classic test theory, we generated 21 job precariousness items and had them reviewed by experts. In Study 1 ( N = 282, 63% female, mean age 22 years), exploratory factor analysis yielded four factors of job conditions, security, remuneration, and flexibility, each with 3 items. In Study 2 ( N = 211, 75% female, mean age 22 years), confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that this four-factor model was the best fit compared to unidimensional, second-order, and bifactor models. Cronbach’s α coefficients for all factors and the full-scale score were sound (all >.78). Validity was supported by showing that precariousness was related negatively to life satisfaction and employer support and positively to job insecurity, financial strain, and subjective social status. Precariousness was unrelated to age, sex, and hours worked. The Job Precariousness Scale has the potential to promote research into the effects of precarious employment on working students’ current and future functioning and achievement and how experiences of precariousness influence the development of a precarity identity.

show abstract

Section: Phase 4: Construct Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%