2008
DOI: 10.1080/09500690701313995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student‐oriented versus Teacher‐centred: The effect of learning at workstations about birds and bird flight on cognitive achievement and motivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the retention-test timeframe effect and in contradiction of our fourth hypothesis, a change occurred in the PC consumption group between the T-2 and T-3 testing schedules under the implementation teacher-centered method G3 PC . When comparing teacher-centered approaches with student-centered learning at workstations, many authors have reported lower scores with regard to interest, enjoyment, usage, usability of the content and cognitive knowledge of teacher-centered approaches (Heyne & Bogner, 2012;Lord, 2001;Randler & Bogner, 2006;Sturm & Bogner, 2008). These results may have adversely affected follow-up measures in the self-esteem enhancement program.…”
Section: Teachers and External Experts Should Work Together In Drug Pmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In addition to the retention-test timeframe effect and in contradiction of our fourth hypothesis, a change occurred in the PC consumption group between the T-2 and T-3 testing schedules under the implementation teacher-centered method G3 PC . When comparing teacher-centered approaches with student-centered learning at workstations, many authors have reported lower scores with regard to interest, enjoyment, usage, usability of the content and cognitive knowledge of teacher-centered approaches (Heyne & Bogner, 2012;Lord, 2001;Randler & Bogner, 2006;Sturm & Bogner, 2008). These results may have adversely affected follow-up measures in the self-esteem enhancement program.…”
Section: Teachers and External Experts Should Work Together In Drug Pmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Schaal and Bogner (2005) as well as Sturm and Bogner (2008) reported that high achiever revealed significantly higher knowledge in a teacher-centered approach compared to a student-centered approach. This as a result contributed to certain didactic methodical mistakes within the student-centered workstations.…”
Section: Low Achievers and Open Learning Environments Do Not Exclude mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before commencing, the students were given a solid introduction to the workbook program. Sturm and Bogner (2008) showed that this approach could enhance the cognitive outcome. At all workstations, the students had to read their work assignment together, complete the work by using the learning materials offered as well as to discuss and complete the respective tasks together in the workbook.…”
Section: Instruction 1 -Conventional Learning At Worktations (G1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Self-motivation again can be fostered by a feeling of competence, autonomy and relatedness (Deci & Ryan, 2000). Consequently, many studies have highlighted the benefits of student-centered instruction (e.g., Flick, 1993;Lord, 2001) and its positive influence on intrinsic motivation (Sturm & Bogner, 2008;Meissner & Bogner, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%