2010
DOI: 10.1080/02796015.2010.12087774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student Perceptions of Classroom Learning Environments: Development of the ClassMaps Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
35
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Other recent work has come to similar conclusions about student report measures (Fauth et al, 2014). Combined with concerns that students may confound ratings of teacher effectiveness with teacher popularity (Aleamoni, 1999; Doll, Spies, LeClair, Kurien, & Foley, 2010), these findings offer a cautionary note when considering the inclusion of student reports, particularly in the primary grades, in high stakes decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Other recent work has come to similar conclusions about student report measures (Fauth et al, 2014). Combined with concerns that students may confound ratings of teacher effectiveness with teacher popularity (Aleamoni, 1999; Doll, Spies, LeClair, Kurien, & Foley, 2010), these findings offer a cautionary note when considering the inclusion of student reports, particularly in the primary grades, in high stakes decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The need for translating resilience research findings to practice in school systems led to the development of the ClassMaps Survey (CMS; Doll, Spies, LeClair, Kurien, & Foley, 2010a). The CMS assesses students’ perceptions of eight important resilience promoting factors describing the aspects of a classroom/school environment in eight subscales (See Supplemental Materials; Doll et al., 2010a). Oriented toward prevention and intervention, the CMS can also serve as a data-driven problem-solving tool to enhance students’ academic and overall resilience in school settings through a consultation process using class meetings called micro-studies of classrooms (Doll, 2013).…”
Section: Classmaps Survey: a Measure Of Resilience Factors In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oriented toward prevention and intervention, the CMS can also serve as a data-driven problem-solving tool to enhance students’ academic and overall resilience in school settings through a consultation process using class meetings called micro-studies of classrooms (Doll, 2013). Studies conducted in the US have demonstrated that the CMS is easy to use and has robust psychometric properties (Doll et al., 2010a; Doll et al., 2010b). However, it is unclear whether the resilience constructs measured in the CMS stay equivalent across different cultural groups.…”
Section: Classmaps Survey: a Measure Of Resilience Factors In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the quantitative data, the ClassMaps subscale Taking Charge (TC) had a negative relationship to flow (-1.29, p < .001). Doll, Spies, LeClair, et al (2010) described students with high TC ratings as ones who “understand that they are responsible for their learning, take credit for their academic successes, and devise concrete and rational plans to address academic failures. They clearly value academic progress and are intrinsically motivated students” (p. 206).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In addition, the subscale for academic self-efficacy (“Believing in Me”) provided data to answer the second quantitative research question regarding whether a student would be more likely to experience flow if her self-efficacy matched the teacher’s perception of that student’s self-efficacy. Reliability estimates for each subscale range from .78 to .91 (Doll, Spies, Champion, et al, 2010; Doll, Spies, LeClair, Kurien, & Foley, 2010), allowing for any of the subscales to be used independently (Doll, Spies, LeClair, et al). The ClassMaps survey included 35 items in which students reported their level of agreement for each item using a Likert-type rating scale (0 = never ; 3 = almost always ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%