1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf00117677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student personality characteristics and optimal college learning conditions: An extensive search for trait-by-treatment interaction effects

Abstract: The goal of this research project was to discover those personality characteristics of college students which predispose them towards learning more effectively from one, rather than some other, particular instructional format. Over 800 students in each of two college courses were taught by one of four different methods, and three broad classes of criterion information were assessed: (a) knowledge of course content, (b) amount of extra-curricular reading, and (c) degree of student satisfaction. Each student com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(81 reference statements)
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These students' ratings of teacher effectiveness and value of the course were also higher. A somewhat similar result was obtained by L. F. Goldberg (1972), using a criterion of amount of extra nonrequired reading completed. Thus hope for the fruitfulness of attribute-treatment interactions persists.…”
Section: Achievement Orientationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These students' ratings of teacher effectiveness and value of the course were also higher. A somewhat similar result was obtained by L. F. Goldberg (1972), using a criterion of amount of extra nonrequired reading completed. Thus hope for the fruitfulness of attribute-treatment interactions persists.…”
Section: Achievement Orientationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For example, given that the legitimate influence of person A over person B stems from the "internalized values of B which dictate that A , by virtue of his role or position, has the right to prescribe behavior in B in a given domain" (Raven & Kruglanski, 1970, p. 44 Schneider, 1982). Studies, reviewed above, generally document the influence of intimacy, personal benefits, resistance, and statuddominance (see also Rollins & Thomas, 1976;Goodstadt & Hjelle, 1973). However, perhaps the most important consequence of the results of this study deal with implications concerning how the situational model should be tested.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Recently, a number of researchers have argued that explanatory factors describing how individuals perceive communication environments need to be developed in order to assess the role specific aspects of the environment play in influencing behavior, to study person-situation interactions and to (generally) predict behavior across situations (e.g., Golding, 1975;Miller, Boster, Roloff, & Seibold, 1977;Cody, 1978;Bochner, 1978;Hewes & Haight, 1979;Lustig & King, 1980;Parks, 1980;Powell, 1980). To date, a number of researchers have proposed a variety of situation perception factors (or dimensions) (Magnusson, 1971 ;Wish, 1975;Forgas, 1976;Cody, 1978;Cody & Jordan, 1979;Cody & McLauglin, 1980), and several researchers have assessed the impact of situation perception on preferences of message strategies (Miller et al, 1977;Lustig & King, 1980;McLaughlin, Cody & Robey, 1980;Cody, McLaughlin, & Schneider, 1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ALAN MILLER that few ATΓs have been reliably demonstrated and point to inadequacies in both the theory and methods being used (Berliner & Cahen, 1973;Bracht, 1970;Cronbach & Snow, 1977;Goldberg, 1972;Mitchell, 1969;Salomon, 1972;Shulman, 1970;Tobias, 1976). The general impression conveyed is that considerable improvements in both the conceptualization and operationalization of the components of interac tions are needed and that this may take some time to achieve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%