“…In the scoping review, several of these dimensions were found to be positively impacted by pedagogical approaches linked to local contexts. In particular, several studies reported increases in student STEM knowledge (Althauser and Harter, 2016;Buck et al, 2016;Leonard et al, 2016;Gates, 2017;Herman et al, 2019;Kermish-Allen et al, 2019;Kinslow et al, 2019;Ritter et al, 2019;Land et al, 2020;Litts et al, 2020), more positive dispositions towards STEM subjects (Buck et al, 2016;Francis et al, 2016;Leonard et al, 2016;Rahmawati and Koul, 2016;Gates, 2017;Zimmerman and Weible, 2017;Donnison and Marshman, 2018;Fűz, 2018;Bølling et al, 2019;Flanagan et al, 2019;Herman et al, 2019;McClain and Zimmerman, 2019;Littrell et al, 2020a;Littrell et al, 2020b;Boda and Brown, 2020;Land et al, 2020), the valuing of activities to develop transferable STEM skills (Francis et al, 2016;Leonard et al, 2016;Rahmawati and Koul, 2016;Zimmerman and Weible, 2017;Donnison and Marshman, 2018;Flanagan et al, 2019;McClain and Zimmerman, 2019;Litts et al, 2020), and opportunities to engage with science experts (Leonard et al, 2016;Kermish-Allen et al, 2019;McClain and Zimmerman, 2019). Increases in science capital are associated with the likeli...…”