2020
DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2020.1736516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student perspectives on climate change through place-based filmmaking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten of the studies used qualitative methods only, 11 studies used a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, with only four studies using exclusively quantitative methods and having sample sizes of more than 300 students. Articles were related to STEM with some focusing on mathematics (Althauser and Harter, 2016;Walkington and Bernacki, 2019), science (Buck et al, 2016;Francis et al, 2016;Leonard et al, 2016;Rahmawati and Koul, 2016;Gates, 2017;Zimmerman and Weible, 2017;Fűz, 2018;Bølling et al, 2019;Flanagan et al, 2019;Herman et al, 2019;Iversen and Jónsdóttir, 2019;Kermish-Allen et al, 2019;Kinslow et al, 2019;McClain and Zimmerman, 2019;Zimmerman et al, 2019;Littrell et al, 2020a;Littrell et al, 2020b;Land et al, 2020), technology (Litts et al, 2020), and general community issues with links to STEM pedagogy (Donnison and Marshman, 2018;Ritter et al, 2019;Kim et al, 2020). While most studies approached localized learning by taking students to community and environmental contexts outside of the classroom, other studies connected students with experts and their communities through the internet (Kermish-Allen et al, 2019) or brought the outside world into classrooms through virtual reality (Ritter et al, 2019;Boda and Brown, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ten of the studies used qualitative methods only, 11 studies used a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, with only four studies using exclusively quantitative methods and having sample sizes of more than 300 students. Articles were related to STEM with some focusing on mathematics (Althauser and Harter, 2016;Walkington and Bernacki, 2019), science (Buck et al, 2016;Francis et al, 2016;Leonard et al, 2016;Rahmawati and Koul, 2016;Gates, 2017;Zimmerman and Weible, 2017;Fűz, 2018;Bølling et al, 2019;Flanagan et al, 2019;Herman et al, 2019;Iversen and Jónsdóttir, 2019;Kermish-Allen et al, 2019;Kinslow et al, 2019;McClain and Zimmerman, 2019;Zimmerman et al, 2019;Littrell et al, 2020a;Littrell et al, 2020b;Land et al, 2020), technology (Litts et al, 2020), and general community issues with links to STEM pedagogy (Donnison and Marshman, 2018;Ritter et al, 2019;Kim et al, 2020). While most studies approached localized learning by taking students to community and environmental contexts outside of the classroom, other studies connected students with experts and their communities through the internet (Kermish-Allen et al, 2019) or brought the outside world into classrooms through virtual reality (Ritter et al, 2019;Boda and Brown, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some articles (Rahmawati and Koul, 2016;Donnison and Marshman, 2018) identified that students had an opportunity to develop a critical voice and that they led the learning with their teachers only assisting when necessary. Students who were previously disengaged with STEM learning in the classroom showed an increase engagement in a localised setting (Althauser and Harter, 2016;Rahmawati and Koul, 2016) because students came to see subjects like science as personally relevant (Littrell et al, 2020a;Littrell et al, 2020b;Boda and Brown, 2020). In summary, it was found that the use of authentic instruction to teach STEM in the context of real-world circumstances promoted longer-term learning and increased student comprehension of the relevance of STEM in the real world (e.g., Althauser and Harter, 2016;Leonard et al, 2016;Rahmawati and Koul, 2016;Gates, 2017;Zimmerman and Weible, 2017;Bølling et al, 2019;Ritter et al, 2019;Littrell et al, 2020a;Littrell et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Increased Student Aspirations Enjoyment Interest and Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, place-based education aims to connect students with local environments and instil in them a sense of agency and engage them to take part in local action to solve environmental and social issues (Khadka et al, 2020;McInerney et al, 2011). As such, place-based approaches can help overcome the many challenges climate change educators face (Littrell et al, 2020). Inherent in place-based education is therefore the connection to local stakeholders and the confrontation with several perspectives and knowledges (competencies 5 and 6).…”
Section: The Need For Climate Change Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially true because climate change education in schools and colleges can actually be detrimental if teachers are not well- and scientifically informed about climate change. Littrell et al ( 2020 ) point out that it is important for teachers and students to learn about the causes, consequences and mitigation of climate change because climate change continues to affect communities around the world, even while the process of climate change is slow (Choon et al 2019 ). It is argued that greenhouse gas emissions have reached levels unprecedented since pre-industrial times (Hussain et al 2020 ; Shaffril et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Perceptions Of Climate Change: Importance Causes Impacts and Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%