2019
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-9316-4.ch002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student Support for Information and Communication Technology Modules in Open Distance Environments

Abstract: The purpose of the chapter relates to providing perspectives on students' uptake of virtual learning environment (VLE) technologies in an information and communication technology (ICT) module taught in an open and distance e-learning (ODeL) environment. With the aim of helping students to access the assessment and support provided via the VLE, possibly improving the pass rate of the module, it provides readers with an overview and summary of the content of this chapter. Examples of how concepts are formulated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the majority of children were of low reading proficiency and limited variability, it was difficult to evaluate the potential benefits that may be gained from a gamified environment in terms of the results (floor effect). As a corollary, it is fair to anticipate that students, both within and outside of the classroom, might benefit from being encouraged to read at their own speed and in a manner in which they find enjoyable (Goosen & van Heerden, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the majority of children were of low reading proficiency and limited variability, it was difficult to evaluate the potential benefits that may be gained from a gamified environment in terms of the results (floor effect). As a corollary, it is fair to anticipate that students, both within and outside of the classroom, might benefit from being encouraged to read at their own speed and in a manner in which they find enjoyable (Goosen & van Heerden, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%