1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0742-051x(97)00024-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student teachers' knowledge of literacy practices in school

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relegation of literacy instruction to English teachers is also pointed out by Hall () and Lester (). The burden of responsibility on English teachers is particularly troubling if English teachers’ penchant for literary texts causes them to prefer humanities‐based texts over non‐fiction (Hanauer, ). As a result of the increased movement toward discipline‐specific literacies, as well as the existing reality of English teachers’ perceived responsibility for literacy instruction, it is critical to examine the ways in which English teachers are taught to address reading and writing instruction, particularly through the methods courses that they take as part of their certification programmes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relegation of literacy instruction to English teachers is also pointed out by Hall () and Lester (). The burden of responsibility on English teachers is particularly troubling if English teachers’ penchant for literary texts causes them to prefer humanities‐based texts over non‐fiction (Hanauer, ). As a result of the increased movement toward discipline‐specific literacies, as well as the existing reality of English teachers’ perceived responsibility for literacy instruction, it is critical to examine the ways in which English teachers are taught to address reading and writing instruction, particularly through the methods courses that they take as part of their certification programmes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, secular, literary reading and religious reading are both subject to the institutional accretion of authorized interpretations. This institutional aspect of Biblical reading is evidenced in an empirical study by Hanauer (1997), who found that Israeli, college-aged teacher trainees considered Bible reading (a core school subject in Israel) similar to the reading of both literature and history (as opposed to the reading biology, chemistry, geography and computers) because all three stress interpretation of text. Bible reading was perceived as similar to literature reading because both involved close attention to textual features, and as similar to history reading because both involved "rote learning of defined interpretations" (p. 858).…”
Section: Schooling and Literacy Socializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, combining history and literature can be accepted as something natural rather than artificial (Vansover, 2015). Thus, teaching written and oral Torah can also be integrated with history teaching (Hanauer, 1997). Combining geography and history is seen as totally natural since it enables strengthening the geographic background as a base for understanding historical processes (Meir, 1982).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%