1972
DOI: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.1972.36.9.tb00581.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student tutoring in preclinical technique laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The earliest study included evaluated only the benefits of a student receiving tutoring for learning dental carving 15 . Among the evaluated methods for teaching carving, the geometric method was found to be effective in one of the included studies 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The earliest study included evaluated only the benefits of a student receiving tutoring for learning dental carving 15 . Among the evaluated methods for teaching carving, the geometric method was found to be effective in one of the included studies 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one study was found to have a low risk of bias in the six factors analyzed; it was a randomized study 1 . The other studies analyzed only two or three factors 6 , 15 17 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individualized instruction has long been established as the optimum method of learning (Waugh 1982). The Lancastrian educational system of the 1800s was based on student tutoring (Fuller & Denehy 1972). However, in most US medical schools, the enormous and overwhelming amount of material to be absorbed often results in teachers lecturing and students studying to pass examinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tutoring programmes at a number of medical and dental schools have previously been described (Fuller & Denehy 1972; Claycomb et al 1980; Trevino & Eiland 1980; Yeager 1981; Rhodes & Swedlow 1983; Walker‐Bartnick et al 1984). These programmes have had different eligibility requirements, different purposes and numerous limitations (Wellington & Montero 1978; Trevino & Eiland 1980; Walker‐Bartnick et al 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%