Students’ achievement motivation in Finnish and Chinese higher education and its relation to perceived teaching‐learning environments

Abstract

This cross‐cultural study of Finnish and Chinese students set out to compare the levels of achievement motivation (AM) in order to investigate whether the differences in them might be explained by the different cultural response styles and whether these response styles could be controlled for with a method which includes response style variables as covariates in ANCOVA. This study also scrutinizes relationships between perceived teaching‐learning environments (TLE) and AM within each cultural group. The survey sample consisted of 3,035 Finnish and 2,309 mainland Chinese university students. Finnish students were found to rate the level of AM markedly higher than do Chinese students. It was determined that the method applied for response style controlling is not suitable for cross‐cultural studies, even though it is recommended for this use. A modification of the method, which is based on robust statistical tools, was found not to change this conclusion, but it can nevertheless be used to obtain useful information about the effects of response style differences. The results also show that similar relationships between AM and TLE could be identified in the data of both groups. However, for the Finnish group AM is related to perceived suitable workload, whereas for the Chinese group it is related to teacher encouragement.

Teacher Training Can Make a Difference: Tools to Overcome the Impact of COVID-19 on Primary Schools. An Experimental Study

“…Similarly, preventing teacher burnout has been linked to decreases in disruptive behavior among students and greater general stability of the classroom [50][51][52], as well as student motivation and academic commitment [53][54][55][56]. Teachers with low stress levels and no burnout symptoms and classes with high coping skills have been associated with enriched student outcomes [57][58][59][60][61][62].…”

Exploring students’ science motivation across grade levels and the role of inductive reasoning in science motivation

“…Interactive activities in school and family environments are likely to impact children's academic motivation and achievement (Pintrich & Schunk, 2002). Experiences in classrooms notably impact student motivation and school performance (Bathgate & Schunn, 2017;Hernesniemi et al, 2020). Students' motivation toward learning is positively tied to parental involvement in schooling (Fan et al, 2012;Gonzalez-DeHass et al, 2005) and parents' education levels (Acharya & Joshi, 2009).…”

The importance of perceived quality of instruction, achievement motivation and difficulties in self‐regulation for students who drop out of university

“…student achievement). Consistent with these assumptions, low quality instruction can lead to difficulties in self-regulated learning (Hernesniemi et al, 2020) and is negatively associated with learning and achievement motivation (Sogunro, 2017). For instance, excessive demands and workload within a seminar can be associated with problems in dealing with this requirement on a learning activity level.…”

“…Finally, there is evidence that students tend to drop out of their study programme when the perceived quality of instruction is low (Georg, 2009; Schiefele et al, 2007). Low quality of instruction is associated with less achievement motivation and less self‐regulated learning (Hernesniemi et al, 2020; Sogunro, 2017). Again, less is known about their interplay and their common relevance for dropping out of an university study programme.…”