2017
DOI: 10.14434/ijdl.v8i2.21363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students as Researchers, Collaborators, & End-users: Informing Campus Design

Abstract: Students in undergraduate design programs often lack opportunity to conduct original research and apply their findings to project solutions. Consequently, they struggle with identifying and framing a design problem, understanding the importance of research-based design, and how to appropriately apply research findings to the needs and desires of project stakeholders. In interior design, this unawareness can lead to design solutions that appeal to the eye, but lack defensible rationale and often do not solve th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the students' reflection, this strategy improved their critical thinking skill and prepared them for their future design projects. Similar results were reported in a later study by Huber et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the students' reflection, this strategy improved their critical thinking skill and prepared them for their future design projects. Similar results were reported in a later study by Huber et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In parallel with this study, students' confidence also increased as evidenced in their verbal and visual presentations. The results also accord with the later observation (Huber et al , 2017), which showed that research integration strategies assist students for making decisions which leads to design solutions that meet the needs of the users.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Design thinking, whereas, is the pedagogical tool that guides students to successful problem-solving solutions (Chamberlain & Mendoza, 2017). Domains with ill-defined and complex problems (e.g., interior design) benefit the most from the educational applications of PBL and design thinking (Galford, Hawkins & Hertweck, 2015;Huber, Waxman & Clemons, 2017;Jonassen & Hung, 2008). The authors, therefore, exposed students to an open-ended problem-solving project that required flexible decision-making in considerations of multiple factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%