2015
DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/6158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ Attitudes towards Information Technology and the Relationship with their Academic Achievement

Abstract: The present quantitative study aims to find out the underlying factors of attitudes towards information technology and the relationship with academic achievement among students, through a self-developed questionnaire. The attitudes of the respondents were assessed in terms of three dimensions; namely affection, behavior, and belief. The results revealed a statistically significant difference between Arts and Science students in terms of their attitude towards IT in favor of Science students, and also proved th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
7
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in this research, significant data regarding the gender and age of the participants were not found. Abdullah et al [48] found similar results in their study; affective dimension towards ICT seemed to be lower than behavioural and cognitive attitudes. In contrast, Wahyuni [49] found different results.…”
Section: Attitudes Towards Ict: Related Studiessupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, in this research, significant data regarding the gender and age of the participants were not found. Abdullah et al [48] found similar results in their study; affective dimension towards ICT seemed to be lower than behavioural and cognitive attitudes. In contrast, Wahyuni [49] found different results.…”
Section: Attitudes Towards Ict: Related Studiessupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In each of them, the score or assessment of the attitude (whether cognitive, behavioural or affective) is different. For example, in the studies conducted by Abdullah et al [48] and Judi et al [47], affective attitudes had lower scores than cognitive and behavioural attitudes, while in the present study, affective attitudes obtained a score between these two dimensions. On the other hand, for Jegede et al [12] and Wahyuni [49] the affective dimension had the highest valuation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…El 12,23 % (n = 106) de la muestra trabaja en universidades privadas, y el Este trabajo de investigación tiene Este trabajo de investigación tiene como objetivo principal diseñar y como objetivo principal diseñar y desarrollar un instrumento para medir desarrollar un instrumento para medir las actitudes hacia la tecnología de los las actitudes hacia la tecnología de los docentes universitarios y analizar sus docentes universitarios y analizar sus propiedades psicométricas propiedades psicométricas A) Fase I. Diseño del cuestionario En esta fase se diseñó el cuestionario de actitudes hacia la tecnología para la enseñanza y la investigación (CAT-EI). El CAT-EI se elaboró siguiendo un sistema de dimensiones, indicadores e ítems basados en las contribuciones de autores como Abdullah et al (2015), Judi et al (2016), Ordóñez y Romero (2016), Tejedor et al (2009), Wahyuni (2018) y Rosen et al (2016), adaptando la teoría del modelo ACC a la medida de las dos facetas principales del trabajo de los docentes universitarios: la investigación y la enseñanza. De esta manera, el instrumento fue configurado por dos dimensiones de actitud: actitudes afectivas, cognitivas y comportamentales para la enseñanza (ACC-E) y actitudes afectivas, cognitivas y comportamentales para la investigación (ACC-I).…”
Section: Participantesunclassified
“…En lo relativo a la fiabilidad, los valores de cada escala y la prueba total son más altos que los encontrados para otros instrumentos similares (Abdullah et al, 2015;Judi et al, 2016;Ordóñez y Romero, 2016;Tejedor et al, 2009;Wahyuni, 2018;Rosen et al, 2016), lo que confirma las buenas propiedades del instrumento. Además, no fue necesario eliminar ítems en función de un posible aumento de la fiabilidad del test.…”
Section: Estudios De Investigaciónunclassified
“…al., 1999 (Cooper, et. al., 1999 Falloon, 2012;Small, et al 2012;Martin, et al, 2013;Oassim, et Govender, 2012;Muller, et al, 2014;Abdullah, et al, 2015;Akturk, et al, 2015;Kumar, 2015;Varol, 2015;Dastjerdi, 2016;Kedrowicz, et al, 2016…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%