2013
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ awareness of malaria at the beginning of national malaria elimination programme in China

Abstract: BackgroundIn the battle against malaria in China, the rate of elementary and high school students’ awareness on malaria knowledge is an important index for malaria elimination, but only rare data is available. This study aimed to investigate the level of malaria awareness in students at elementary and high schools in malaria endemic areas of China, and to provide the baseline information for the malaria elimination.MethodsThis cross-sectional survey was conducted in 20 different malaria-endemic provinces in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A lack of reasonable knowledge of infectious diseases contributes to low detection rates, interruption of treatment, and discrimination [4,8]. The improvement of public perception about malaria could not only help the general population protect themselves, but could also promote those individuals suspected of being infected to seek medical help early and be treated more completely [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A lack of reasonable knowledge of infectious diseases contributes to low detection rates, interruption of treatment, and discrimination [4,8]. The improvement of public perception about malaria could not only help the general population protect themselves, but could also promote those individuals suspected of being infected to seek medical help early and be treated more completely [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five malaria knowledge choice questions, data collection training and implementation, and quality control were performed as described previously, and each question was awarded one mark for a correct answer, while each incorrect answer was given a mark of zero [4]. The total marks for the five questions were evaluated as follows: scores of five were considered excellent, while scores of three to four, one to two, and zero were considered good, poor, and very poor, respectively.…”
Section: Questionnaire Design and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations