A s the chapters in this volume make abundantly clear, undergraduate psychology assessment efforts are multifaceted and highly diverse. Growth and progress have resulted in a variety of approaches that instructors can tailor to specific learning environments and program goals. In this chapter, we take the view that although our own assessment practices may be adequate and often innovative, and even highly effective, it is useful to learn from others to gain fresh perspectives and ideas.We define assessment as the "graded and non-graded tasks, undertaken by an enrolled student as part of their formal study, where the learner's performance is judged by others (teachers or peers)" (Bearman et al., 2016, p. 547). From a psychology education perspective, assessment includes the reliable and valid measurement of intended learning outcomes, including the appropriate application of psychological knowledge, skills, and attitudes by universitylevel students.To help structure our "looking outside the box," we use a framework created by a multi-institutional Australian project on learning-oriented assessment. This approach, the Assessment Design Decision Framework (ADDF), takes an educator "work-as-done" (vs. "work-as-imagined") perspective (Bearman et al., 2016, p. 546). That is, in contrast to education theory or institutional policy, the ADDF is based on research that focuses on the reality of the educator's decision making in local educational contexts.