2017
DOI: 10.52041/serj.v16i2.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ Emergent Modelling of Statistical Measures – A Case Study

Abstract: The present study investigates the processes of how German middle school students (age 14) interpret, contrast and evaluate different (informal) statistical measures in order to summarise and compare frequency distributions. To trace the developing insights into the properties of these measures, this paper uses the ‘emergent modelling’ perspective: measures are understood as models, which can either be used to make sense of a given situation or to reason about the statistical measures themselves, e.g. in terms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes urge us to reconsider curricular learning experiences (Watson, 2017). To gain a fuller picture in the presentation of measures of center in the textbooks, there is a need to extend Cai et al (2002)'s study by considering recent studies in measures of center conducted in educational settings, which gave clues about learning trajectories for teaching measures of center (Bakker et al, 2006;Büscher & Schnell, 2017;Makar, 2014) and other crucial elements in teaching statistical concepts including measures of center such as contextual features (e.g., real, authentic context) (Gal, 1995;Makar, 2014;Watson, 2016), graphical displays (Pfannkuch et al, 2010), and technological tools (Bakker et al, 2006;Watson, 2016). Furthermore, international comparison studies would inform countries by pointing to the ways of developing their current curriculum materials (Watson, 2017).…”
Section: Mehtap Kusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes urge us to reconsider curricular learning experiences (Watson, 2017). To gain a fuller picture in the presentation of measures of center in the textbooks, there is a need to extend Cai et al (2002)'s study by considering recent studies in measures of center conducted in educational settings, which gave clues about learning trajectories for teaching measures of center (Bakker et al, 2006;Büscher & Schnell, 2017;Makar, 2014) and other crucial elements in teaching statistical concepts including measures of center such as contextual features (e.g., real, authentic context) (Gal, 1995;Makar, 2014;Watson, 2016), graphical displays (Pfannkuch et al, 2010), and technological tools (Bakker et al, 2006;Watson, 2016). Furthermore, international comparison studies would inform countries by pointing to the ways of developing their current curriculum materials (Watson, 2017).…”
Section: Mehtap Kusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once students determined the safe level of PM10, considering the mean PM10 values by year and location seemed to make sense to them. Hence, the inferences required by these questions facilitated students' use of average measures in meaningful contexts as seen in other studies aimed at promoting students' informal inferential reasoning (Makar, 2014) and modeling (Büscher & Schnell, 2017; to develop their understandings of statistical concepts. Some of the students also looked at the individual recordings of PM10 levels in the dataset and noted a few anomalies at dangerous levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this article, we examined how students explored data and drew conclusions from a The use of statistical measures to summarize distribution properties, such as center and variability, and data representations to visualize those properties are found to be useful models for comparing and reasoning about data distributions in the existing literature (Büscher & Schnell, 2017;Doerr et al, 2017;Fielding-Wells, 2018). Within the 'Explore data' phase of the DA cycle in this study, students primarily relied on statistical summaries (particularly averages) to see a trend in the data when exploring whether PM10 levels reached a dangerous level (Q1-'Level of danger') and have been rising over time (Q2-'Rising overtime').…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations