2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5rp00052a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students' mind wandering in macroscopic and submicroscopic textual narrations and its relationship with their reading comprehension

Abstract: The aim of the current study was to investigate students' mind wandering while reading different types of textual narrations (macroscopic and submicroscopic) in chemistry. Another goal was to determine the relationship between mind wandering and students' reading comprehension. The participants were 65 female ninth grade students in Oman. Using a computer screen, participants were required to read about sodium chloride. A probe-catch procedure was used to measure students' mind wandering. Half of the slides pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important conclusion from individual-differences studies is that TUT rates are reliable: Students who mind-wander more during one reading task also tend to mind-wander more in others (Al-Balushi & Al-Harthy, 2015;McVay & Kane, 2012b). TUT rates thus seem to capture something meaningful about sustained attention during reading.…”
Section: Mind Wandering While Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important conclusion from individual-differences studies is that TUT rates are reliable: Students who mind-wander more during one reading task also tend to mind-wander more in others (Al-Balushi & Al-Harthy, 2015;McVay & Kane, 2012b). TUT rates thus seem to capture something meaningful about sustained attention during reading.…”
Section: Mind Wandering While Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of the study indicate that different active learning activities exerted different cognitive demands on participants. The debating activity refocused participants' attention on the submicroscopic structural orientation of scientific models—the favorite and recommended language of different chemistry education researchers (Al‐Balushi & Al‐Harthy, ; Milenković, Segedinac, & Hrin, ; Prilliman, ; Treagust & Chandrasegaran, ; Warfa, Roehrig, Schneider, & Nyachwaya, ). This was evident in the discussions during the debating activity and then in individual students' written responses after the conclusion of the debating activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite different interpretations, varying representations, and distinct terminologies (Gilbert and Treagust, 2009), Johnstone's model is still used by many researchers in chemistry education (Treagust et al, 2003;Eilks et al, 2007;Al-Balushi and Al-Harthy, 2015;Becker et al, 2015;Irby et al, 2016). For this study, we decided to start our investigation from using the chemistry triangle as initially proposed by Johnstone (1991).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%