2012
DOI: 10.1080/03634523.2012.656669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students' Perceived Understanding Mediates the Effects of Teacher Clarity and Nonverbal Immediacy on Learner Empowerment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, clarity is related positively to cognitive learning, affective learning, state motivation (Chesebro, 2003;Chesebro & McCroskey, 2001;Houser & Frymier, 2009;Sidelinger & McCroskey, 1997;Titsworth, 2001aTitsworth, , 2001b, cognitive and emotional interest (Mazer, 2012(Mazer, , 2013a(Mazer, , 2013b, and academic self-efficacy (LaBelle, Martin, & Weber, 2013). Additionally, instructor clarity is associated with more efficient notetaking (Titsworth, 2004) and enhances student learner empowerment through perceived understanding (Finn & Schrodt, 2012). Moreover, instructor clarity appears to discourage undesirable student behaviors, as clarity is related negatively to state receiver apprehension (Chesebro, 2003;Chesebro & McCroskey, 1998) and frequency of students' in-class texting (Johnson, 2013).…”
Section: Instructor Claritymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For instance, clarity is related positively to cognitive learning, affective learning, state motivation (Chesebro, 2003;Chesebro & McCroskey, 2001;Houser & Frymier, 2009;Sidelinger & McCroskey, 1997;Titsworth, 2001aTitsworth, , 2001b, cognitive and emotional interest (Mazer, 2012(Mazer, , 2013a(Mazer, , 2013b, and academic self-efficacy (LaBelle, Martin, & Weber, 2013). Additionally, instructor clarity is associated with more efficient notetaking (Titsworth, 2004) and enhances student learner empowerment through perceived understanding (Finn & Schrodt, 2012). Moreover, instructor clarity appears to discourage undesirable student behaviors, as clarity is related negatively to state receiver apprehension (Chesebro, 2003;Chesebro & McCroskey, 1998) and frequency of students' in-class texting (Johnson, 2013).…”
Section: Instructor Claritymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Collectively, these results suggest that the SPIUS possesses concurrent and discriminant validity. In a follow-up study, Finn and Schrodt (2012) found that students' perceptions of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy enhanced their understanding, which in turn positively predicted their learner empowerment. They concluded that perceived understanding functions as a key theoretical mechanism, further explaining the associations among student perceptions of instructors' communication behaviors and learner empowerment.…”
Section: Student Perceptions Of Instructor Understandingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This technique has been used successfully in a previous research (e.g. Finn & Schrodt, 2012;Frymier et al, 1996). Administration of questionnaires was completed in approximately 20 min, after which students were debriefed about the study.…”
Section: Study Participants Environment and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%