1987
DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp1602_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students' Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward Disabilities: A Comparison of Twenty Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
1
15

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
35
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies show differences between boys' and girls' attitudes to disability (Furnham & Gibbs, 1984;Gash & Coffee, 1995;Royal & Roberts, 1987;Sandberg 1982;Weisel & Florian, 1990). For example, Gash and Coffee (1995) found that young girls were more likely to identify, form friendships and be more socially concerned about children with disabilities.…”
Section: Outline Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies show differences between boys' and girls' attitudes to disability (Furnham & Gibbs, 1984;Gash & Coffee, 1995;Royal & Roberts, 1987;Sandberg 1982;Weisel & Florian, 1990). For example, Gash and Coffee (1995) found that young girls were more likely to identify, form friendships and be more socially concerned about children with disabilities.…”
Section: Outline Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One obvious explanation is that the antidiscrimination provisions of the ADA created opportunities for disabled workers to move voluntarily to better jobs. Another explanation 4 See Royal and Roberts (1987) and Westbrook, Legge, and Pennay (1993) for rankings of negative attitudes (prejudice) toward persons with different health conditions. Baldwin and Johnson (2000) report larger unexplained wage differentials between nondisabled workers and workers with health conditions subject to more prejudice (MP) than between nondisabled workers and workers with conditions subject to less prejudice (LP).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building barriers were remembered most often, with Grades 5 and 6 showing the greatest change. It is unclear whether the older children remembered more of the program at the posttest or whether their greater change scores reflected previous findings that older children are more knowledgeable about disabilities [22] and are more accepting of their peers with a disability [23]. Regardless, sensitizing individuals to the difficulties associated with accessibility in public buildings remains an important component to disability awareness promotion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%