1999
DOI: 10.1080/10417949909373153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ perceptions of effective and ineffective communication by college teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While a majority of the misbehaviors were perceived as being rarely used, a finding similarly obtained by Kearney et al, the most frequently used misbehavior was ineffective teaching behaviors. This misbehavior encapsulates the misuse of both rhetorical (e.g., clarity, relevance) and relational (e.g., immediacy, confirmation) instructional communication behaviors students typically associate with effective teaching (Kramer & Pier, 1999;Myers, 2010;Myers et al, 2014;Nussbaum, 1992;Waldeck, Plax, & Kearney, 2010). This finding is actually encouraging because it suggests that students are cognizant of, and paying attention to, what it means for an instructor to be an effective communicator in the classroom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While a majority of the misbehaviors were perceived as being rarely used, a finding similarly obtained by Kearney et al, the most frequently used misbehavior was ineffective teaching behaviors. This misbehavior encapsulates the misuse of both rhetorical (e.g., clarity, relevance) and relational (e.g., immediacy, confirmation) instructional communication behaviors students typically associate with effective teaching (Kramer & Pier, 1999;Myers, 2010;Myers et al, 2014;Nussbaum, 1992;Waldeck, Plax, & Kearney, 2010). This finding is actually encouraging because it suggests that students are cognizant of, and paying attention to, what it means for an instructor to be an effective communicator in the classroom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, because results of this study suggest that low affect instructors spur imagined interactions with students, and that these interactions co-occur with dissent, instructors who want to deter students from having negative IIs about them should focus on fostering affective learning in the classroom. This may be done by utilizing effective instructional behaviors such as immediacy, humor, clarity, and confirmation (Kramer & Pier, 1999). Second, although instructors will occasionally enact behaviors that damage students' affective learning (Kearney, Plax, Hays, & Ivey, 1991), being pleasant and welcoming to students after making mistakes may help students form positively valenced IIs that address their concerns and allow them to forgive the instructor's transgression (Vallade et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Q-sort methodology, which evolved from factor theory, was originally developed by the British physicist William Stephenson for psychological studies [19]. Despite earlier criticism of the technique in the academic community, the technique has gained increasing attention and acceptance as a tool for research in many areas from psychology [20], to medicine [25], communication [29], social sciences [30], and education [32].…”
Section: A the Q-sort Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%