Students’ Perspective on Remote On-Line Teaching and Learning at the University of Latvia in the First and Second COVID-19 Period

Abstract

In Spring 2020, due to the rapid spread of COVID-19, all educational institutions in Latvia, including the University of Latvia (UL), transitioned from face-to-face on-site learning to remote learning. After a short period of face-to-face on-site learning in autumn, UL returned to remote learning in November for the second time. This paper investigates the UL students’ perspectives on remote teaching and learning at the UL during the first and second COVID-19 periods. The research assesses several remote study organization aspects, including the lecturer’s and student’s digital skills, their access to information and support during the study process, planning and implementation of the study process, and students’ acquisition of the content. The study used an original questionnaire designed in the Spring 2020 semester. Seven questions from the first questionnaire were included in another follow-up questionnaire distributed in the Spring 2021 semester. A total of 2248 UL students from the Spring 2020 semester and 742 students from the Spring 2021 semester participated in the study, representing 13 faculties across all study levels. The survey responses were collected via a QuestionPro survey platform and then downloaded into an IBM SPSS 28 file for a reliability check. Next, descriptive statistical analyses were conducted for each reported survey item using Microsoft Excel 2016. The research presented here implies that, in general, students perceive positive improvements in almost all the investigated aspects of the organization of the remote study process when comparing the first and second COVID-19 periods, which could indicate a certain level of resilience in students and university lecturers when subject to COVID circumstances. However, the results reveal that students have, in one year, developed a more realistic approach in assessing their digital skills. The results lead us to believe that remote on-line learning is not just a short-term solution but could become a valuable element for providing qualitative education in the long term. It could indicate that the students and lecturers at university are ready for new and sustainable higher education study organization solutions in the future.

Online Teaching during COVID-19 Pandemic: Teachers’ Experiences from a Chinese University

“…However, as indicated above, such pedagogical transformation is not easy for teachers who have been practicing traditional teaching methods. Therefore, they need proper training to improve their pedagogical knowledge and ICT skills and competencies [26,27]. This could help them manage online learning effectively and, thus, address students' learning needs using student-centered pedagogy.…”

“…There are several research projects conducted worldwide regarding online teaching and learning, particularly after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic [6,8,26,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. However, most of these research papers are based on quantitative studies, particularly on survey of students.…”

Grade Prediction Modeling in Hybrid Learning Environments for Sustainable Engineering Education

“…The objective is to evaluate the sustainability of the methodology suggested by previous experiments in an early meta-COVID-19 period or in future blended learning environments. To do so, the evaluation methods used exactly the same tools and in particular the same communication platform, while taking into account the changing guidelines imposed by the health situation [38].…”

Effects of Online Problem-Based Learning to Increase Global Competencies for First-Year Undergraduate Students Majoring in Science and Engineering in Japan

“…For example, ERT implementation at the School of Telecommunication Engineering at the University of Spain, the research by Iglesias-Pradas et al reported that students' academic performance was well kept [13]. In the case of a university in Latvia, it was reported that students and faculties were well adapted to online courses, which can be classified as ERT, and see the new prospects as new ways of teaching in the long run [14]. Şenda ǧ and Odabaşi discuss that there are no particular differences in learning outcomes between online and face-to-face teaching [15].…”