2019
DOI: 10.1057/s41284-019-00219-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students plans to obtain a license to carry on campus after the passage of Texas Senate Bill 11

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Schildkraut et al (2018), the most powerful aspects were political orientation and regional socialization. In a postimplementation study, Nodeland and Saber (2019) found that owning a firearm and political orientation were the two most important factors. Hassett and Kim (2021) highlighted the importance of political beliefs but also gender and race, as white people and males were more likely to hold more favorable attitudes.…”
Section: Previous Research and Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Schildkraut et al (2018), the most powerful aspects were political orientation and regional socialization. In a postimplementation study, Nodeland and Saber (2019) found that owning a firearm and political orientation were the two most important factors. Hassett and Kim (2021) highlighted the importance of political beliefs but also gender and race, as white people and males were more likely to hold more favorable attitudes.…”
Section: Previous Research and Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important to differentiate between pre-implementation expectations and the opinions formed after actual implementation, which provide results on the basis of lived experience. In addition to replicating classic attitude surveys (e.g., Nodeland and Saber, 2019), some have expanded on the analytical spectrum, thus deepening understandings on attitudinal differences and how university members are adapting to the potential presence of guns around them. Such studies include Hayes et al (2021) on the attitudinal differences between those who support the law and those who actually carry on campus, McMahon-Howard et al (2020) on factors differentiating campus groups, Scherer et al (2021) on how pro-gun attitudes may obscure the perception of negative impacts of campus carry, and Ruoppila and Butters (2021) on how the views of supporters or opponents are not necessarily black-and-white, indicating nuanced understandings and preferences around a complex issue (see also Kyle et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature [16] integrates blockchain technology and IoT technology into the campus cloud platform management platform to ensure the security and privacy of data. Literature [17] compares four frameworks for assessing campus handgun portability factors to understand the underlying logic that can determine the portability of firearms on campus and investigates the impact on campus security before and after the adoption of a program for mandatory portability on campus. Literature [18] reviews the circumstances and details of the vicious shooting incident at Virginia Tech and discusses how to improve campus security, and the study provides some important references for the relevant authorities responsible for campus security.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yuanru Peng and Li Hu. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1) (2024)[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%