1998
DOI: 10.1090/cbmath/007/07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
391
1
59

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 421 publications
(464 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
391
1
59
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides it is concluded that students do not need to prove the statement since they believe that its accuracy seems very clear (Harel & Sowder, 1998), their awareness about whether their own demonstrations are proofs is changeable (Chazan, 1993b), they attempt to prove through verbal expressions, they believe that they can prove a statement with a few examples (Weber, 2001) and desire towards proving is low since proving is hard for them.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides it is concluded that students do not need to prove the statement since they believe that its accuracy seems very clear (Harel & Sowder, 1998), their awareness about whether their own demonstrations are proofs is changeable (Chazan, 1993b), they attempt to prove through verbal expressions, they believe that they can prove a statement with a few examples (Weber, 2001) and desire towards proving is low since proving is hard for them.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the interview data related to proving shows that prospective teachers do not know how to use their current knowledge (Weber, 2001), therefore, have difficulties in understanding and producing proofs (Güven, Çelik & Karataş, 2005;Harel & Sowder, 1998;Jones, 2000;Martin & Harel, 1989;Moore, 1994), they are not able to decide from where to start proving (Sarı, Altun, Aşkar, & 2007;Weber, 2001) and have difficulties in remembering knowledge later because of memorization (Condradie & Firth, 2000;Galindo, 1998). which they may utilize when they become teachers can be provided (Herbst, 2002;Mariotti, 2000).…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Yevdokimov, 2010. ) Over the longer term, the convincing power of the emerging rules for the child is often rooted not only in the observation that the rules 'work' in all available situations, but in the external role of authorities such as a parent, a teacher or a textbook (Harel & Sowder, 1998).…”
Section: What Is Proof For Growing Individuals?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mathematics education, there is ongoing concern with how students and teachers alike appreciate various forms of mathematical argument, especially proof (Harel & Sowder, 1998). Schoenfeld (1989), for example, suggests that instead of understanding proof as a form of explanation, many students conceive of it as a means for arriving at the truth of the empirically obvious.…”
Section: The Structure Of the Argumentmentioning
confidence: 99%