1996
DOI: 10.1086/461841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students' Scientific Explanations and the Contexts in Which They Occur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this classification of explanation provides a useful framework for defining scientific explanations, it requires modifications when used to examine students' explanations in classrooms. The adequacy and completeness of an explanation depend on the knowledge available to the explainer and the knowledge assumed to be available to the explainee (Achinstein, 1971;McEwan & Bull, 1991;Wong, 1996). The explanation of "why the sky is blue" shown previously is a complete scientific explanation according to the D-N model but it cannot be fully understood by learners at the middle school level.…”
Section: Features Of Inquiry Learning and Scientific Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this classification of explanation provides a useful framework for defining scientific explanations, it requires modifications when used to examine students' explanations in classrooms. The adequacy and completeness of an explanation depend on the knowledge available to the explainer and the knowledge assumed to be available to the explainee (Achinstein, 1971;McEwan & Bull, 1991;Wong, 1996). The explanation of "why the sky is blue" shown previously is a complete scientific explanation according to the D-N model but it cannot be fully understood by learners at the middle school level.…”
Section: Features Of Inquiry Learning and Scientific Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies reported in the literature about scientific reasoning have been done in the context of school subjects rather than with everyday societal and environmental problems (for example, Newton 1999, Samarapungavan 1992, Schauble 1996, Vosniadou and Brewer 1992, Wong 1996. Only a few studies put emphasis on reasoning in areas of daily life situations (for example, Jiménez-Aleixandre and Pereiro-Munoz 2002, Kortland 1996, Kuhn 1991, Ratcliffe 1996, Yang and Anderson, 2003.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are also interested in addressing common science misconceptions. framework of scientific inquiry in which students are encouraged to ask questions, speculate about possible answers, and test and revise their ideas [22,23]. This inquiry cycle promotes a view of science as a process, rather than as a body of facts, and encourages students to bring their own experiences and conjectures into the science classroom.…”
Section: The Stc Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%