Student mindset beliefs about the
malleability of intelligence
have been linked to student outcomes. However, recent meta-analyses
showed mixed findings on how student mindset impacts their outcomes
depending on the environment and context, such as the mindset that
the instructor projects in the classroom. The current work utilizes
Social Cognitive Theory to elucidate the relationship among student
perceptions of faculty mindset, affective factors (belonging, self-efficacy,
and utility value), and behavioral factors (course grade) using a
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) lens within the chemistry context
at a demographically diverse institution. Structural Equation Modeling
(SEM) path analysis revealed that student perceptions of the instructor
mindset did not directly predict chemistry course grades. However,
a significant indirect effect, mediated by students’ sense
of academic misfit, was detected. The more students perceived instructors
to endorse a fixed mindset, the more academic misfits they reported
in their courses, which led to lower chemistry grades. ACT math scores
(indicators of prior preparation) unsurprisingly had significant direct
and indirect impact on chemistry course grades. Additionally, multigroup
moderation analysis revealed that regression pathways did not differ
based on race, gender, or age group. While this work highlights the
benefit of instructors promoting a healthy learning environment that
projects a growth mindset to students, this must be coupled with institutional
support to help build foundational knowledge to prepare students for
the rigor of chemistry courses and increase the chance of success
for all students.