2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ usage of reading strategies in the faculty of education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The aforementioned instruments were extensively employed in various contexts, such as Indian (Taraban et al, 2013), Indonesian (Vianty, 2007, Iranian (Anjomshoaa et al, 2012;Tavakoli, 2014;Zare, Maftoon, 2014), Japanese (Shikano, 2013), Turkish (Cogmen, Saracaloglu, 2009;Solak, Altay, 2015), Spanish (Martinez, 2008) and have mainly shown that EFL learners use reading strategies to a significant extent, as the use was measured as either medium or high. The results of these studies have also clearly indicated that different factors have a considerable impact on the metacognitive reading strategy use, such as gender, study field, nationality, reading proficiency and have emphasized the need that these and other factors be explored further.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned instruments were extensively employed in various contexts, such as Indian (Taraban et al, 2013), Indonesian (Vianty, 2007, Iranian (Anjomshoaa et al, 2012;Tavakoli, 2014;Zare, Maftoon, 2014), Japanese (Shikano, 2013), Turkish (Cogmen, Saracaloglu, 2009;Solak, Altay, 2015), Spanish (Martinez, 2008) and have mainly shown that EFL learners use reading strategies to a significant extent, as the use was measured as either medium or high. The results of these studies have also clearly indicated that different factors have a considerable impact on the metacognitive reading strategy use, such as gender, study field, nationality, reading proficiency and have emphasized the need that these and other factors be explored further.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that proficient readers tend to use Global Strategies while less proficient readers tend to use Local Strategies, especially at the word level (Horiba, 1996;Lau, 2006;Plakans, 2009). Reading strategies in this context have been assessed mainly by questionnaire (e.g., Carrell, 1989;Cogmen & Saracaloglu, 2009;Phakiti, 2003) and the think-aloud protocol. Especially since the 1990s, more studies have used the think-aloud protocol to examine reading strategy (see Table 1).…”
Section: Second Language Reading and Reading Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Cogmen & Saracaloglu, 2009), the use of RCS enhances reading comprehension and overcomes comprehension difficulties at both the word and sentence level. This is because, the use of RCS also has been found to be important, especially for those EFL learners who wanted to achieve high levels of English language literacy and success in academic reading (Ikeda & Takeuchi, 2006;Malcolm, 2009;Sadjirn, 2013;Sheorey & Mokhtari, 2001).…”
Section: Reading Comprehension Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reading strategies used in different texts, tasks and settings were also investigated in several studies in schools and tertiary levels (Cogmen & Saracaloglu, 2009;Lee, 2012;Tercanlioglu, 2004;Malcolm, 2009;Zhang et al, 2008). For example, Malcolm (2009) investigated the reading strategy awareness through a questionnaire among 160 EFL students at a medical university in Bahrain.…”
Section: Reading Comprehension Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation