2015
DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2015.1114631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students' use of their plurilingual resources in Australian schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is clearly the case where students do not have the opportunity to formally learn or even to use their first language for learning. The implementation of a translanguaging framework also impacts on monolingual students and teachers whose cultural and linguistic awareness can be broadened in contexts where language is central to learning (Fielding, 2016; García & Li, 2014; García-Mateus & Palmer, 2017; Hamman, 2018). Furthermore, teachers’ own perceptions may be challenged or confirmed by the benefits that students experience (Holdway & Hitchcock, 2018).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is clearly the case where students do not have the opportunity to formally learn or even to use their first language for learning. The implementation of a translanguaging framework also impacts on monolingual students and teachers whose cultural and linguistic awareness can be broadened in contexts where language is central to learning (Fielding, 2016; García & Li, 2014; García-Mateus & Palmer, 2017; Hamman, 2018). Furthermore, teachers’ own perceptions may be challenged or confirmed by the benefits that students experience (Holdway & Hitchcock, 2018).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shift can become the basis of a new way to establish connections between the home and school (Pacheco & Miller, 2016) through the authentic development of bilingual identities (García-Mateus & Palmer, 2017). Translanguaging can thus enhance well-being as it confirms the equal value of all linguistic resources and gives agency to individuals to choose when and where to deploy their skills (Alamillo, Yun, & Bennett, 2016; Fielding, 2016; Rosiers, Van Lancker & Delarue, 2018).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classrooms are learning communities in which teachers and learners interact with each other on a daily basis in a social and interactive space. Classroom interaction pedagogy (CIP) is a theoretical phenomenon and a pedagogical approach that provides English First Additional Language (EFAL) practice opportunities and contributes to learners' language development towards communicative competence (Fielding, 2016;Van Laere, Rosiers, Van Avermaet, Slembrouck & Van Braak, 2017). Zhang and Wang (2012: 111) and Savignon (2018: 1) affirm that communicative competence is the ability to convey and interpret messages and to negotiate meaning in a target language wherever social interaction occurs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G. Prasad (2015), for instance, presents the analysis of the process of creating plurilingual multimodal books with students and teachers across five different schools and presented very positive results of inclusive plurilingual pedagogy. A similar successful account of this kind of pedagogy is presented by R. Fielding (2016) whose research results proved that children in Australian schools enjoyed the learning process more by using their plurilingulal experience and teachers expanded their own linguistic repertoires. The researcher maintains the view that teachers must reconceptualize language learning to acknowledge the language resources of children with plurilingual experiences.…”
Section: The Novelty Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 90%