2020
DOI: 10.14710/nmjn.v10i2.29864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ Views of Classroom Debates as a Strategy to Enhance Critical Thinking and Oral Communication Skills

Abstract: Background: The skills in effective communication and critical thinking are essential for nurses to apply appropriate judgments in the delivery of patient care. Classroom debates are evident to be an effective strategy that can be used to improve such skills. Unfortunately, research focusing on classroom debates to promote critical thinking and oral communication skills among nursing students has not been extensively explored.   Purpose: This study aimed to explore nursing students’ views of classroom debates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, research shows that pharmacists indicate that during their education they never had the opportunity to participate in an interpersonal communication classes [ 67 ]. It is also worth noting that communication skills can be taught independently of acquired professional knowledge and with the use of less advanced methods of active learning, such as debates or role-taking [ 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, research shows that pharmacists indicate that during their education they never had the opportunity to participate in an interpersonal communication classes [ 67 ]. It is also worth noting that communication skills can be taught independently of acquired professional knowledge and with the use of less advanced methods of active learning, such as debates or role-taking [ 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debates are proved to be an efficient instructional tool to develop analytical thinking abilities in tertiary students (Bacikova, 2018;Nurakhir et al, 2020). This opinion is supported by the statistics drawn from the higher-order thinking tests (Bacikova, 2018;Nureldeen, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…4 Students were also socialized to differing viewpoints that foster critical thinking and openness to perspectives other than their own. 2,5 Students provided evidence for faculty by using the ANA Code of Ethics Rubric for Ethical Debate and ethical principles as a guide. 6,14 Each group used relevant evidence from the literature and other supportive documents to construct and support their perspectives and arguments on their ethical dilemma topic.…”
Section: Achieving Learning Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we strived to keep the debate focused on the assigned topic and encouraged a broad examination of the facets of the dilemma based on the literature, documentation, and evidence review, with the intent to establish a culture that values a difference of opinion and broad-minded thinking as reflected in the literature. 2,3,5 In the final stage of the debate activity, students provided formative feedback about what they had learned or gained from each debate topic. Completion of the team evaluation and debate critique forms allowed the students to self-report new knowledge and insight while reflecting on how the Code guides their responses to clinical experiences and can impact their professional practice.…”
Section: Achieving Learning Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%