Summary
Studies of the uptake and translocation of 14C‐labelled 2, 4‐D, MCPA and aminotriazole in Agrostemma githago L. and Tussilago farfara L. clarified the behaviour of the herbicides in both species.
In A. githago, MCPA was more freely mobile than 2,4‐D after application to the leaf; it was distributed in the plant more rapidly and in greater quantity. Similarly, following root uptake MCPA was transported in the shoot in greater amounts than was 2,4‐D. There is a clear relationship between the susceptibility of A. githago to MCPA and the mobility of the herbicide in the plant.
In T. farfara, 2,4‐D and aminotriazole applied to the leaves were equally well absorbed and relatively rapidly translocated. During the period up to 72 h the amounts of herbicide in the plant increased to similar levels; after that, 14C activity in plants treated with 2,4‐D fell slightly whereas there was further accumulation of aminotriazole. Following uptake through the roots, translocation and accumulation in the leaves were considerably greater with aminotriazole than with 2,4‐D. The lack of accumulation of 2,4‐D could be a factor in the resistance of T. farfara to this herbicidie.
Recherches sur l'absorption et la migration d'herbicides marqués au
14
C dans Agrostemma githago L. et Tussilago farfara L.