The role of motor cortex in non-primate mammals remains unclear. More than a 10 century of stimulation, anatomical and electrophysiological studies has implicated neural activity in 11 this region with all kinds of movement. However, following the removal of motor cortex, rats retain 12 most of their adaptive behaviours, including previously learned skilled movements. Here we revisit 13 these two conflicting views of motor cortex and present a new behaviour assay, challenging 14 animals to respond to unexpected situations while navigating a dynamic obstacle course.15 Surprisingly, rats with motor cortical lesions show clear impairments facing an unexpected collapse 16 of the obstacles, while showing no impairment with repeated trials in many motor and cognitive 17 metrics of performance. We propose a new role for motor cortex: extending the robustness of 18 sub-cortical movement systems, specifically to unexpected situations demanding rapid motor 19 responses adapted to environmental context. The implications of this idea for current and future 20 research are discussed. 21 22 45 the other. He connected the orderly march of these spasms to the existence of localized lesions in 46 the post-mortem brain of his patients and hypothesized that the origin of these fits was uncontrolled 47 excitation caused by local changes in cortical grey matter (Jackson, 1870). In that same year, Fritsch 48 and Hitzig published their famous study demonstrating that it is possible to elicit movements by 49 direct stimulation of the cortex in dogs (Fritsch and Hitzig, 1870). Furthermore, stimulation of 50 different parts of the cortex produced movement in different parts of the body (Fritsch and Hitzig, 51 1870). It appeared that the causal mechanism for epileptic convulsions predicted by Hughlings 52 Jackson had been found, and with it a possible explanation for how the intact brain might control 53 movement. The cerebral cortex was already considered at the time to be the seat of reasoning 54 and sensation, so if activity over this so-called motor cortex was able to exert direct control over the 55 musculature of the body, then it might, in the normal brain, be the area that connects volition to 56 muscles (Fritsch and Hitzig, 1870). The Goltz-Ferrier debates 58 David Ferrier, a Scottish neurologist deeply impressed by the ideas of Hughlings Jackson and by the 59 positive results of Fritsch and Hitzig's experiments, proceeded to reproduce and expand on their 60 observations with comprehensive stimulation studies showing how activity in the motor cortex 61 was sufficient to produce a large variety of movements across a wide range of mammalian species 62 (Ferrier, 1873). Meanwhile, other researchers across Europe such as Goltz and Christiani were 63 facing a dilemma: in many of the so-called "lower mammals" massive lesions of the cerebral cortex 64 failed to demonstrate any visible long-term impairments in the motor behaviour of animals (James, 65 1885; Goltz, 1888). These two lines of inquiry first clashed at the seventh Inte...