Neurobiology of Food and Fluid Intake
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-48643-1_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of Food Intake: Lessons from Nontraditionally Studied Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 235 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for the mice with a more severe restriction, total food intake was significantly lower than controls. It has been reported that showed that wild animals, such as Siberian hamsters primarily increase foraging and food hoarding, but laboratory animals including rats and mice prefer to increase food intake when they are faced with an energy challenge (Bartness, 1997;Bartness and Day, 2003;Bartness and Demas, 2004;Wood and Bartness, 1996). It seemed that Swiss mice were able to compensate for mild FD by increasing food intake, but did not compensate for a more severe reduction of food availability by further increasing food intake, indicating a limitation on the capability of gastrointestinal tract to process the ingested diet (Johnson et al, 2001a;Koteja, 1996;Koteja et al, 1994).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for the mice with a more severe restriction, total food intake was significantly lower than controls. It has been reported that showed that wild animals, such as Siberian hamsters primarily increase foraging and food hoarding, but laboratory animals including rats and mice prefer to increase food intake when they are faced with an energy challenge (Bartness, 1997;Bartness and Day, 2003;Bartness and Demas, 2004;Wood and Bartness, 1996). It seemed that Swiss mice were able to compensate for mild FD by increasing food intake, but did not compensate for a more severe reduction of food availability by further increasing food intake, indicating a limitation on the capability of gastrointestinal tract to process the ingested diet (Johnson et al, 2001a;Koteja, 1996;Koteja et al, 1994).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of energy homeostasis and body weight balance, researchers have increasingly focused on behaviors, as the animals usually change their behavioral rhythm when environmental variations occur. Foraging and food-hoarding behavior increased significantly in Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) under the condition of energetic challenges, such as a reduction of food availability (Bartness, 1997;Bartness and Day, 2003;Bartness and Demas, 2004;Wood and Bartness, 1996). Hambly and Speakman (2005) calculated the energy expended on activity in MF1 mice and found a significantly decreased activity in restricted individuals compared with ad libitum controls, in which the restriction group decreased the energy expended on activity by 27.5%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) and other hamster species (for review see: (Bartness and Demas, 2004)) primarily increase foraging ; Bartness and Day, 2003) and food hoarding (Bartness and Clein, 1994;Wood and Bartness, 1996; Bartness, 1997) in response to energetic challenges, rather than food intake as with laboratory rats and mice (for review see: ). Siberian hamsters and other animals that have the capacity to transport significant amounts of food (for review see: (Vander Wall, 1990)) use food hoarding as a crucial part of their ingestive behavioral repertoire in response to many naturally occurring energetic challenges (e.g., pregnancy, lactation (Bartness, 1997; Bartness and Day, 2003); for review see: ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, after food deprivation, changes in appetitive and consummatory ingestive behaviors occur, but vary among species (for review, see Refs. 3,4). Specifically, food-deprived laboratory rats increase their foraging for food and, when they find it, eat it (e.g., Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%