For some years it has been a common practice for surgeons to insert a drainage tube into the common duct after choledochotomy for calculi, stricture, chronic pancreatitis, suppuration or even malignancy. Whether such drainage is always necessary if the obstruction has been relieved, has often been questioned by those who believe that primary closure of the duct can often be done without danger to the patient, especially where the obstruction is not complete. There appears to be no general agreement as to how long the drainage should be continued in the various conditions, nor is there any general unanimity of opinion as to whether prolonged biliary drainage is dangerous.Wangensteen (1) has called attention to the effect on patients of prolonged biliary drainage and Walters and Parham (2) have commented on the development of cholerrhagia as an unfavorable sequel to surgical drainage of the biliary tract. Two more recent papers by Walters, Greene and Frederickson (3) and Greene, Walters and Fredrickson (4) have again emphasized the necessity of a careful study of the entire problem in an effort to improve surgical end-results in cases of the type under discussion.During a period when we were studying the anion-cation concentrations of human gallbladder bile removed from normal and diseased gallbladders during life, we obtained and studied the bile from 18 patients who had obstruction of the common duct from calculi, stricture, malignancy or infection, and who lived at least five days after operation. Four died after this period and 14 recovered. The specimens were collected daily, measured, and analyzed for certain of their constituents. The drainage was continued for a variable period, the longest being 191 days.