2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of hydrate nucleation with high pressure differential scanning calorimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1, are presumably specific to the apparatus and method followed in this work to some degree; while the similar results of Heneghan et al 5 for ice nucleation may suggest similarities exist for measurements conducted using the ALTA method, the subcooling-induction time relationships observed in other hydrate formation experiments (e.g., highpressure differential scanning calorimetry) differ significantly. 18 However, such a relationship is of value even if it is limited to a particular apparatus because it enables an equivalency to be established between scanning measurements of subcooling and induction time measurements at constant subcooling. Depending on the apparatus, the former method may be more efficient and produce more reliable results when quantitatively assessing the performance of kinetic hydrate inhibitors, than the more conventional latter method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1, are presumably specific to the apparatus and method followed in this work to some degree; while the similar results of Heneghan et al 5 for ice nucleation may suggest similarities exist for measurements conducted using the ALTA method, the subcooling-induction time relationships observed in other hydrate formation experiments (e.g., highpressure differential scanning calorimetry) differ significantly. 18 However, such a relationship is of value even if it is limited to a particular apparatus because it enables an equivalency to be established between scanning measurements of subcooling and induction time measurements at constant subcooling. Depending on the apparatus, the former method may be more efficient and produce more reliable results when quantitatively assessing the performance of kinetic hydrate inhibitors, than the more conventional latter method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…High-pressure differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) has recently received considerable attention due to its possible application for measuring the hydrate phase equilibrium conditions [14,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In uninhibited system (no salts), the measurements of hydrate equilibrium conditions through DSC method were successfully conducted by several studies [27,28].…”
Section: High-pressure Differential Scanning Calorimetry (Dsc) Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While hydrate nucleation and formation have been described in the literature [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] , there are relatively few studies on hydrate adhesion. Most adhesion studies to date have used a micromechanical adhesion testing apparatus to measure adhesion forces between hydrate particles, or between hydrate and ice particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%